StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Google Cloud CDN vs Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud CDN vs Google Cloud Storage

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes75
Google Cloud CDN
Google Cloud CDN
Stacks86
Followers234
Votes3

Google Cloud CDN vs Google Cloud Storage: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Google Cloud CDN (Content Delivery Network) and Google Cloud Storage. Both services are provided by Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and are commonly used for storing and delivering content over the internet.

  1. Scalability and Performance: Google Cloud Storage is primarily designed for storing and retrieving data, providing highly durable and available object storage. It offers high scalability, allowing users to store and retrieve any amount of data with low latency. On the other hand, Google Cloud CDN is a content delivery network that caches content at the edge locations worldwide to provide faster delivery to end-users. It improves performance by serving content from the nearest edge location instead of the origin server, reducing latency and improving global availability.

  2. Caching and Content Delivery: Google Cloud Storage doesn't inherently provide caching capabilities. Each request for the stored content is directly served from the storage bucket, requiring the data to be retrieved from the origin server for each request. In contrast, Google Cloud CDN is specifically designed for caching and content delivery. It caches frequently accessed content at edge locations, reducing the load on the origin server and improving response times for subsequent requests.

  3. Content Purging and Invalidation: In Google Cloud Storage, once the content is stored, it cannot be directly invalidated or purged. Any changes or updates to the content require uploading a new version, and the old version will continue to be delivered until all the cached versions are expired. In contrast, Google Cloud CDN provides the ability to easily invalidate or purge content from the cache. This allows for quick updates or removal of content from edge locations, ensuring that the latest versions of the content are delivered to users.

  4. Origin Server Control and Authentication: Google Cloud Storage directly serves content from the storage bucket, and the control over content delivery lies solely with the storage bucket configuration. In comparison, Google Cloud CDN provides more control over content delivery by allowing the use of an origin server. This allows for custom authentication mechanisms, such as verifying request signatures or integrating with identity providers, to control access to the content at the origin server before being served by the CDN.

  5. Pricing Model: Google Cloud Storage has a pricing model based on storage and data egress, i.e., the amount of data sent out of the storage. It doesn't charge separately for content retrieval. On the other hand, Google Cloud CDN has a separate pricing model based on the volume of data transferred and the number of requests served. This means that using Google Cloud CDN for content delivery incurs additional cost on top of the storage and egress charges of Google Cloud Storage.

  6. SSL/TLS Support: Google Cloud Storage supports SSL/TLS encryption for secure communication between clients and the storage bucket. However, the SSL/TLS termination and encryption are handled at the origin server level instead of the edge locations. In contrast, Google Cloud CDN supports SSL/TLS termination at the edge locations, allowing for faster and secure content delivery directly from the edge to the end-users.

In summary, Google Cloud CDN and Google Cloud Storage have significant differences in their primary purposes and functionalities. While Google Cloud Storage is focused on scalable object storage, Google Cloud CDN offers caching and content delivery capabilities to improve performance, control content delivery, and reduce latency through edge locations worldwide.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Storage, Google Cloud CDN

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments
Ben
Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud CDN
Google Cloud CDN

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Google Cloud CDN leverages Google's globally distributed edge caches to accelerate content delivery for websites and applications served out of Google Compute Engine. Cloud CDN lowers network latency, offloads origins, and reduces serving costs. Once you've set up HTTP(S) Load Balancing, simply enable Cloud CDN with a single checkbox.

High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing
Anycast;Invalidation;HTTP/2;HTTPS; Logging; Origins
Statistics
Stacks
2.0K
Stacks
86
Followers
1.2K
Followers
234
Votes
75
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Scalable
  • 19
    Cheap
  • 14
    Reliable
  • 9
    Easy
  • 3
    Chealp
Pros
  • 3
    Extremely Fast
Cons
  • 2
    Very expensive not for newbies
Integrations
No integrations available
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Storage, Google Cloud CDN?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

CloudFlare

CloudFlare

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

KeyCDN

KeyCDN

KeyCDN offers super fast and secure content delivery for minimal loading time. In addition to the CDN, it also offers advanced image processing and many other features such as live logs and Let's Encrypt SSL.

Fastly

Fastly

Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds.

MaxCDN

MaxCDN

The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

jsDelivr

jsDelivr

jsDelivr is a free CDN for open source developers, with advanced features for javascript projects with access to NPM and Github It uses multiple CDN providers, resulting in the best possible uptime and performance.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase