StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Low Code Platforms
  5. Google App Maker vs Microsoft PowerApps

Google App Maker vs Microsoft PowerApps

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Maker
Google App Maker
Stacks177
Followers237
Votes0
Microsoft PowerApps
Microsoft PowerApps
Stacks166
Followers167
Votes0

Google App Maker vs Microsoft PowerApps: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google App Maker and Microsoft PowerApps are both low-code development platforms that allow users to create custom business applications without the need for extensive coding knowledge. While both platforms offer similar features, there are several key differences between them that make each platform unique.

1. Integration Capabilities: Google App Maker is tightly integrated with G Suite, allowing users to easily connect their applications with other Google services such as Gmail, Drive, and Sheets. On the other hand, Microsoft PowerApps offers seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, including Office 365, SharePoint, and Dynamics 365. This difference in integration capabilities makes each platform more suitable for users within their respective ecosystems.

2. Deployment Options: Google App Maker applications can only be deployed within a G Suite domain, limiting its accessibility outside of the organization. In contrast, Microsoft PowerApps offers more flexibility in deployment options, allowing applications to be published on various platforms such as web browsers, iOS, Android, and Windows devices. This difference in deployment options makes PowerApps more versatile in reaching a wider audience.

3. User Interface Design: Google App Maker provides a visual drag-and-drop interface designer, making it easy for users to create and customize their application's user interface. Microsoft PowerApps, on the other hand, has a more comprehensive visual design interface with a wider range of controls and styling options. This difference in user interface design capabilities gives PowerApps an advantage in creating more visually appealing and interactive applications.

4. Data Integration: While both platforms offer integrations with various data sources such as Google Cloud SQL, Microsoft SQL Server, and SharePoint, Google App Maker focuses more on integrating with Google Cloud services. In contrast, Microsoft PowerApps offers a broader range of data connectors, including Azure SQL Database, Common Data Service, and over 200 other external connectors. This difference in data integration capabilities makes PowerApps more versatile in connecting to a wider range of data sources.

5. Workflow Automation: Google App Maker provides a visual way to create workflows and automate tasks using its built-in App Scripting feature. Microsoft PowerApps offers a similar capability with its Power Automate (formerly Microsoft Flow) integration, which provides a more robust and mature workflow automation platform with a wide range of pre-built connectors and actions. This difference in workflow automation capabilities gives PowerApps an advantage in creating more complex and sophisticated automation scenarios.

6. Pricing Structure: Google App Maker is included as part of the G Suite Business and Enterprise editions, making it a cost-effective option for organizations already using G Suite. Microsoft PowerApps, on the other hand, offers several pricing plans that can be purchased separately or as part of the comprehensive Dynamics 365 licensing. This difference in pricing structure gives PowerApps more flexibility in catering to different organizations' budget and needs.

In summary, Google App Maker and Microsoft PowerApps differ in their integration capabilities, deployment options, user interface design, data integration capabilities, workflow automation, and pricing structure. Each platform has its unique strengths and suitability depending on the organization's requirements and existing ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Maker
Google App Maker
Microsoft PowerApps
Microsoft PowerApps

App Maker lets you develop powerful apps with relative ease. Create a model to manage your data, build a UI in the visual editor, use Apps Script to write some scripts, and you're on your way.

It is a suite of apps, services, connectors and data platform that provides a rapid application development environment to build custom apps for your business needs. Using Power Apps, you can quickly build custom business apps that connect to your business data stored either in the underlying data platform (Common Data Service) or in various online and on-premises data sources (SharePoint, Excel, Office 365, Dynamics 365, SQL Server, and so on).

-
Provide professional developers the tools to seamlessly extend app capabilities with Azure Functions and custom connectors to proprietary or on-premises systems; Give everyone the power to build the apps they need with advanced functionality previously only available to professional developers—including pre-built AI components; Empower your team to start building and launching apps right away using pre-built templates, drag-and-drop simplicity, and quick deployment—then roll out continuous improvements as needed
Statistics
Stacks
177
Stacks
166
Followers
237
Followers
167
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
G Suite
G Suite
Google Cloud SQL
Google Cloud SQL
Microsoft 365
Microsoft 365
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Excel

What are some alternatives to Google App Maker, Microsoft PowerApps?

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Stamplay

Stamplay

The API-based development platform enabling developers to do 80% of the job in 1% of the time thanks to: out of the box APIs for users and data, one-click integration with any API, scalable infrastructure and SDKs. Build Rome in a day.

Kumologica

Kumologica

It is the first low-code development solution that run your integration and automation services serverlessly on any cloud. It provides drag and drop visual designer and low code approach to ensure the greatest speed and flexibility to support a wide range of integrations compatible with most of the platforms and cloud providers.

Backand

Backand

Backand is a powerful backend-as-a-service for AngularJS that provides out-of-the-box social login, push notifications, Ionic integration and much more.

Stacker

Stacker

Stacker lets you turn your spreadsheets into applications. You plug in your Airtable or Google Sheets and Stacker automatically generates you app with login, forms and buttons. Stacker includes built in permissions, UI and business logic.

Magic xpa

Magic xpa

It enables rapid creation of cross-platform business applications for desktop, web and mobile, so you can take advantage of new business opportunities quickly and on-demand.

Knack

Knack

Build simple web apps like a member directory, job listings, employee time tracking, business directory, contact directory, product catalogue, or equipment tracker.

Mavo

Mavo

Mavo helps you turn your static HTML into reactive web applications without a single line of programming code.

iLeap

iLeap

ILeap is a low-code app development platform to build custom apps and automate workflows visually, helping you speed up digital transformation.

Retool

Retool

Retool is the fast way to build internal tools. Drag-and-drop our building blocks and connect them to your databases and APIs to build your own tools, instantly. Built by developers, for developers. Trusted by startups and Fortune 500s.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase