Go vs HAML vs HTML5

Overview

Golang

Stacks24.0K

Followers13.9K

Votes3.3K

GitHub Stars130.7K

Forks18.4K

HAML

Stacks601

Followers331

Votes267

GitHub Stars3.8K

Forks580

HTML5

Stacks152.9K

Followers131.1K

Votes2.2K

Go vs HAML vs HTML5: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison between Go, HAML, and HTML5, we will highlight key differences that set these programming languages apart from each other.

Syntax Complexity: Go language has a concise syntax that focuses on simplicity and readability, making it easier for developers to write and understand code. On the other hand, HAML uses indentation to define structure, reducing the need for closing tags, which can lead to cleaner and more organized code. HTML5, being a markup language, requires explicit opening and closing tags for elements, which can increase the overall complexity of the code.
Rendering Efficiency: Go is a compiled language, which means the code is converted into machine-readable format before execution, resulting in faster performance. HAML, being a templating language, helps in speeding up the development process by providing shortcuts for writing HTML, but it can sometimes affect rendering speed due to additional parsing required. HTML5, as a standard markup language, does not provide any additional features for optimization, potentially impacting page load times.
Learning Curve: Go is known for its strong typing system and low-level features, which can make it challenging for beginners to grasp initially. HAML, with its simplified syntax and focus on indentation, offers an easier learning curve for those new to web development. HTML5, as a markup language, is relatively easier to understand compared to programming languages like Go, making it more accessible to beginners.
Community Support: Go has a growing community of developers who contribute to its ecosystem and provide resources for learning and troubleshooting. HAML, although popular for its code readability and ease of use, has a smaller community compared to mainstream languages, which can impact the availability of support and resources. HTML5, being a widely used markup language, has a vast community of web developers who constantly contribute to its development and provide extensive support.
Flexibility: Go offers a good balance between performance and ease of development, making it suitable for a wide range of applications, from system programming to web development. HAML, as a templating language, is more focused on generating HTML code efficiently and may not be as versatile for other types of programming tasks. HTML5, being a markup language, is primarily used for defining the structure of web pages and lacks the extensive functionalities of a programming language like Go.
Maintenance and Scalability: Go's strong typing system and error checking capabilities make it easier to maintain and scale codebases over time, ensuring better consistency and reliability in large projects. HAML's simplicity and concise syntax can aid in maintenance efforts by reducing the chances of introducing errors when modifying code. HTML5, while essential for web development, may require additional tools and frameworks to manage complexity and scalability in large-scale projects.

In Summary, Go, HAML, and HTML5 differ in their syntax complexity, rendering efficiency, learning curve, community support, flexibility, and maintenance and scalability, catering to diverse needs and preferences in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Golang, HAML, HTML5

Ítalo

VP Platform Engineering at Lykon

Feb 19, 2020

Decided

We decided to use python to write our ETLs and import them into metabase via a lambda. Before python we tried using Go, but overall go was way more verbose than Python when writing the ETLs. Go also had some issues managing memory when using the S3 upload manager library. This was a deal breaker for us that made us switch to Python.

In the end the solution was much cleaner and maintainable.

261k views261k

Comments

Mohamed

Software Engineer at YottaHQ Inc.

Dec 2, 2019

Decided

PHP is easy to learn and you can get up and running in no time, available on almost all hosting providers and you can find developers easily. It has some great frameworks for building your backend like Symfony and Laravel. However, it can be challenging when running an enterprise and needs some adjustments, very recommended for starting a new project or startup.

208k views208k

Comments

Amir

Feb 7, 2020

Review

This post is a bit of an obvious one, as we have a web application, we obviously need to have HTML and CSS in our stack. Though specifically though, we can talk a bit about backward compatibility and the specific approaches we want to enforce in our codebase.

HTML : Not much explanation here, you have to interact with HTML for a web app. We will stick to the latest standard: HTML 5.

CSS: Again if we want to style any of our components within he web, we have to use to style it. Though we will be taking advantage of JSS in our code base and try to minimize the # of CSS stylesheets and include all our styling within the components themselves. This leaves the codebase much cleaner and makes it easier to find styles!

Babel: We understand that not every browser is able to support the cool new features of the latest node/JS features (such as redue, filter, etc) seen in ES6. We will make sure to have the correct Babel configuration o make our application backward compatible.

Material UI (MUI): We need to make our user interface as intuitive and pretty as possible within his MVP, and the UI framework used by Google will provide us with exactly that. MUI provides pretty much all the UI components you would need and allows heavy customization as well. Its vast # of demos will allow us to add components quickly and not get too hung up on making UI components.

We will be using the latest version of create-react-app which bundles most of the above along many necessary frameworks (e.g. Jest for testing) to get started quickly.

128k views128k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Golang	HAML	HTML5
Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.	Haml is a markup language that’s used to cleanly and simply describe the HTML of any web document, without the use of inline code. Haml functions as a replacement for inline page templating systems such as PHP, ERB, and ASP. However, Haml avoids the need for explicitly coding HTML into the template, because it is actually an abstract description of the HTML, with some code to generate dynamic content.	HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 130.7K	GitHub Stars 3.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 18.4K	GitHub Forks 580	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 24.0K	Stacks 601	Stacks 152.9K
Followers 13.9K	Followers 331	Followers 131.1K
Votes 3.3K	Votes 267	Votes 2.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros 557 High-performance 398 Simple, minimal syntax 365 Fun to write 305 Easy concurrency support via goroutines 273 Fast compilation times Cons 43 You waste time in plumbing code catching errors 25 Verbose 23 Packages and their path dependencies are braindead 16 Google's documentations aren't beginer friendly 15 Dependency management when working on multiple projects	Pros 68 Clean and simple 49 No html open/close tags 39 Easier to write than ERB 36 Forces clean and readable code 34 Simpler markup language Cons 3 It's not Pug	Pros 448 New doctype 389 Local storage 334 Canvas 285 Semantic header and footer 240 Video element Cons 2 Easy to forget the tags when you're a begginner 1 Long and winding code
Integrations
Revel Martini	Rails	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Golang, HAML, HTML5?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Rust

Rust is a systems programming language that combines strong compile-time correctness guarantees with fast performance. It improves upon the ideas of other systems languages like C++ by providing guaranteed memory safety (no crashes, no data races) and complete control over the lifecycle of memory.

Related Comparisons

Go vs HAML vs HTML5: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison between Go, HAML, and HTML5, we will highlight key differences that set these programming languages apart from each other.

Syntax Complexity: Go language has a concise syntax that focuses on simplicity and readability, making it easier for developers to write and understand code. On the other hand, HAML uses indentation to define structure, reducing the need for closing tags, which can lead to cleaner and more organized code. HTML5, being a markup language, requires explicit opening and closing tags for elements, which can increase the overall complexity of the code.
Rendering Efficiency: Go is a compiled language, which means the code is converted into machine-readable format before execution, resulting in faster performance. HAML, being a templating language, helps in speeding up the development process by providing shortcuts for writing HTML, but it can sometimes affect rendering speed due to additional parsing required. HTML5, as a standard markup language, does not provide any additional features for optimization, potentially impacting page load times.
Learning Curve: Go is known for its strong typing system and low-level features, which can make it challenging for beginners to grasp initially. HAML, with its simplified syntax and focus on indentation, offers an easier learning curve for those new to web development. HTML5, as a markup language, is relatively easier to understand compared to programming languages like Go, making it more accessible to beginners.
Community Support: Go has a growing community of developers who contribute to its ecosystem and provide resources for learning and troubleshooting. HAML, although popular for its code readability and ease of use, has a smaller community compared to mainstream languages, which can impact the availability of support and resources. HTML5, being a widely used markup language, has a vast community of web developers who constantly contribute to its development and provide extensive support.
Flexibility: Go offers a good balance between performance and ease of development, making it suitable for a wide range of applications, from system programming to web development. HAML, as a templating language, is more focused on generating HTML code efficiently and may not be as versatile for other types of programming tasks. HTML5, being a markup language, is primarily used for defining the structure of web pages and lacks the extensive functionalities of a programming language like Go.
Maintenance and Scalability: Go's strong typing system and error checking capabilities make it easier to maintain and scale codebases over time, ensuring better consistency and reliability in large projects. HAML's simplicity and concise syntax can aid in maintenance efforts by reducing the chances of introducing errors when modifying code. HTML5, while essential for web development, may require additional tools and frameworks to manage complexity and scalability in large-scale projects.

Go vs HAML vs HTML5

Overview

Go vs HAML vs HTML5: What are the differences?