StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Go Modules Packages
  5. native vs webview

native vs webview

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

native
native
Stacks115
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars727
Forks164
webview
webview
Stacks5
Followers1
Votes0

native vs webview: What are the differences?

# Native vs. WebView

Native apps are developed using platform-specific technologies, such as Java or Swift, while WebView apps are essentially websites wrapped in a native app shell.

1. **Performance**: Native apps generally offer better performance due to direct access to device hardware and APIs, whereas WebView apps rely on a browser engine for rendering content, resulting in slower performance.
2. **User Experience**: Native apps provide a smoother and more responsive user experience compared to WebView apps, which may have limitations in terms of animations, gestures, and overall responsiveness.
3. **Offline Functionality**: Native apps can offer offline functionality by storing data locally, while WebView apps require an internet connection to load content and may struggle to provide offline capabilities.
4. **Customization**: Native apps can be highly customized to fit the platform and provide a seamless experience, whereas WebView apps may have design limitations and struggle to match the look and feel of the native platform.
5. **Integration with Device Features**: Native apps have seamless integration with device features like camera, GPS, and notifications, allowing for a more interactive and feature-rich experience, while WebView apps may have limited access to these features.
6. **App Store Distribution**: Native apps need to be published through app stores like Google Play or the App Store, ensuring security and visibility, while WebView apps can be distributed more freely but may lack the same level of trust and discoverability.

In Summary, Native apps offer better performance, user experience, customization, integration with device features, and distribution through app stores compared to WebView apps.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

native
native
webview
webview

MySQL Client API written entirely in Go.

Tiny cross-platform webview library for C/C++/Golang. Uses WebKit (Gtk/Cocoa) and MSHTML (Windows).

Statistics
GitHub Stars
727
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
164
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115
Stacks
5
Followers
0
Followers
1
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to native, webview?

go

go

Google Cloud Client Libraries for Go.

proto

proto

Go support for Google's protocol buffers.

cloudflare

cloudflare

Cloudflare This package provides the package which offers an interface to the CloudFlare gAPI.

net

net

Go supplementary network libraries.

sys

sys

Go packages for low-level interaction with the operating system.

fsnotify

fsnotify

Cross-platform file system notifications for Go.

aws

aws

AWS SDK for the Go programming language.

text

text

Go text processing support.

assertion

assertion

Ginkgo's Preferred Matcher Library.

crypto

crypto

Go supplementary cryptography libraries.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase