StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Go Modules Packages
  5. lzma vs xz

lzma vs xz

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

xz
xz
Stacks102
Followers1
Votes0
GitHub Stars434
Forks41
lzma
lzma
Stacks1
Followers1
Votes0
GitHub Stars417
Forks39

lzma vs xz: What are the differences?

Introduction: 
LZMA and XZ are both compression formats that offer high compression ratios and are widely used in software applications and data archiving.

1. **Compression Algorithm**: The key difference between LZMA and XZ is the compression algorithm they use. LZMA uses the Lempel-Ziv-Markov chain algorithm, while XZ implements the LZMA2 algorithm, which is an improved and optimized version of LZMA. This enhancement in the algorithm used by XZ results in better compression performance compared to LZMA.

2. **Container Format**: Another significant difference is the container format used by LZMA and XZ. LZMA does not have a specified container format and is typically wrapped in other formats like 7z or .lzma. On the other hand, XZ has its container format called .xz, which provides a standard way of storing compressed data. This makes XZ more self-contained and easier to use in various software applications.

3. **Multithreading Support**: XZ offers native multithreading support during both compression and decompression processes, allowing for faster processing on multi-core systems. In contrast, LZMA does not have built-in support for multithreading, which can result in slower compression and decompression speeds on modern hardware.

4. **Memory Usage**: XZ generally consumes more memory during the compression and decompression processes compared to LZMA. This higher memory usage can be a consideration when working with limited resources or when memory efficiency is crucial for specific applications.

5. **Compatibility**: LZMA has been around for a longer time and has broader compatibility with various operating systems and software applications. XZ, being a more recent standard, may have limited support in certain older systems or applications that have not yet adopted the XZ format.

6. **Compression Speed**: In terms of compression speed, LZMA tends to be faster than XZ when compressing data. This difference in speed can be a factor to consider when choosing between the two formats based on the specific requirements of a compression task.

In Summary, LZMA and XZ differ in their compression algorithms, container formats, support for multithreading, memory usage, compatibility, and compression speed.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

xz
xz
lzma
lzma

Pure golang package for reading and writing xz-compressed files.

Pure golang package for reading and writing xz-compressed files.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
434
GitHub Stars
417
GitHub Forks
41
GitHub Forks
39
Stacks
102
Stacks
1
Followers
1
Followers
1
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to xz, lzma?

go

go

Google Cloud Client Libraries for Go.

proto

proto

Go support for Google's protocol buffers.

cloudflare

cloudflare

Cloudflare This package provides the package which offers an interface to the CloudFlare gAPI.

net

net

Go supplementary network libraries.

sys

sys

Go packages for low-level interaction with the operating system.

fsnotify

fsnotify

Cross-platform file system notifications for Go.

aws

aws

AWS SDK for the Go programming language.

text

text

Go text processing support.

assertion

assertion

Ginkgo's Preferred Matcher Library.

crypto

crypto

Go supplementary cryptography libraries.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase