StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Source Code Management Desktop Apps
  5. GitQlient vs SourceTree

GitQlient vs SourceTree

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SourceTree
SourceTree
Stacks10.6K
Followers8.1K
Votes727
GitQlient
GitQlient
Stacks1
Followers9
Votes0

GitQlient vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Introduction:
GitQlient and SourceTree are two popular Git client tools used for managing repositories. Below are the key differences between GitQlient and SourceTree.

1. **User Interface**: GitQlient has a minimalistic user interface with a focus on simplicity and efficiency, making it lightweight and easy to use. On the other hand, SourceTree offers a more feature-rich interface with advanced functionalities, making it suitable for users who prefer a comprehensive set of tools at their disposal.

2. **Cross-Platform Compatibility**: GitQlient is primarily designed for Linux and Windows platforms, providing a consistent experience across these operating systems. SourceTree, on the other hand, is available for both Windows and macOS, offering seamless integration with the respective platform's native features.

3. **Integration with Git Services**: SourceTree offers seamless integration with major Git hosting services like Bitbucket and GitHub, allowing users to easily manage their repositories directly from the tool. GitQlient, however, lacks built-in support for these services, requiring users to perform manual configurations for accessing remote repositories.

4. **Customization Options**: SourceTree provides a wide range of customization options, allowing users to tailor the tool to fit their specific workflow and preferences. In contrast, GitQlient has limited customization features, focusing more on providing a streamlined experience out of the box.

5. **Performance**: GitQlient is known for its fast performance and responsiveness, making it a preferred choice for users who value speed and efficiency in their Git workflow. SourceTree, while feature-rich, may sometimes experience slowdowns and performance issues, especially when dealing with large repositories or complex operations.

6. **Community Support**: SourceTree boasts a robust community support system, with active forums and resources available for users to seek help, share tips, and collaborate with other users. GitQlient, on the other hand, has a smaller user base and limited community support, which may be a consideration for users seeking extensive assistance and resources.

In Summary, GitQlient and SourceTree differ in terms of user interface, cross-platform compatibility, integration with Git services, customization options, performance, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SourceTree, GitQlient

Stefan
Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

  • to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
  • it helps to investigate the history
  • most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SourceTree
SourceTree
GitQlient
GitQlient

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

It is a multi-platform Git client originally forked from QGit. The original idea was to provide a GUI-oriented Git client that was easy to integrate with QtCreator (currently shipped as GitQlientPlugin). This idea has grown since the day 1 to not only cover the integration with QtCreator but also to make it an app on it’s own.

Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.
Easy access to remote actions like: push, pull, submodules management and branches; Branches management; Tags and stashes management; Submodules handling; Allow to open several repositories in the same window; Better visualization of the commits and the work in progress; Better visualization of the repository view
Statistics
Stacks
10.6K
Stacks
1
Followers
8.1K
Followers
9
Votes
727
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 205
    Visual history and branch view
  • 164
    Beautiful UI
  • 134
    Easy repository browsing
  • 87
    Gitflow support
  • 75
    Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines
Cons
  • 12
    Crashes often
  • 8
    So many bugs
  • 7
    Fetching is slow sometimes
  • 5
    Extremely slow
  • 5
    No dark theme (Windows)
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
Mercurial
Mercurial
Git
Git
Qt Creator
Qt Creator

What are some alternatives to SourceTree, GitQlient?

GitKraken

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

GitUp

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

Diff So Fancy

Diff So Fancy

diff-so-fancy builds on the good-lookin' output of git contrib's diff-highlight to upgrade your diffs' appearances.

TortoiseGit

TortoiseGit

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

GitUI

GitUI

It is a blazing fast terminal-UI for git written in Rust. You can inspect, commit, and amend changes. It has context-based help (no need to memorize tons of hot-keys).

pre-commit by Yelp

pre-commit by Yelp

If one of your developers doesn’t have node installed but modifies a JavaScript file, pre-commit automatically handles downloading and building node to run jshint without root. Pre-commit is a multi-language package manager for pre-commit hooks. You specify a list of hooks you want and pre-commit manages the installation and execution of any hook written in any language before every commit. pre-commit is specifically designed to not require root access.

SmartGit

SmartGit

SmartGit is a powerful Git GUI client with support for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana