StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs YouTrack

GitLab vs YouTrack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
YouTrack
YouTrack
Stacks238
Followers185
Votes2

GitLab vs YouTrack: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitLab and YouTrack

GitLab and YouTrack are both popular software development tools that offer a range of features for managing projects, tracking issues, and collaborating with teams. However, there are some key differences between the two platforms that set them apart from each other.

  1. Hosting Options: GitLab offers both a cloud-hosted version and a self-hosted version, giving users the flexibility to choose the deployment option that suits their needs. On the other hand, YouTrack only offers a self-hosted version, meaning users need to set up their own infrastructure to use the platform.

  2. Version Control: GitLab is primarily known for its robust version control capabilities, with support for both Git and Mercurial repositories. It provides a comprehensive set of features for managing code repositories, including branch management, merge requests, and CI/CD integration. YouTrack, on the other hand, does not have built-in version control capabilities and primarily focuses on issue tracking and project management.

  3. Issue Tracking: While both GitLab and YouTrack offer issue tracking features, the approach is slightly different. GitLab integrates issue tracking directly into its version control system, allowing users to associate issues with specific code changes and track their progress. YouTrack, on the other hand, provides a more traditional issue tracking system that allows users to create, assign, and track issues independently of code changes.

  4. Project Management: YouTrack offers a wide range of project management features, including agile boards, time tracking, and custom workflows. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for managing projects and tracking progress. GitLab, on the other hand, has a more limited set of project management features, focusing primarily on code management and CI/CD. It does offer some basic project management capabilities, such as milestones and issue boards, but they are not as extensive as those provided by YouTrack.

  5. Integration Ecosystem: GitLab has a strong integration ecosystem and supports a wide range of third-party tools and services, including popular CI/CD pipelines, collaboration tools, and project management platforms. YouTrack also offers integrations with popular tools, but the selection is not as extensive as GitLab. Additionally, GitLab has built-in container registry and Kubernetes integration, which can be beneficial for teams working with containerized applications.

In summary, the key differences between GitLab and YouTrack lie in the hosting options, version control capabilities, issue tracking approach, project management features, and integration ecosystem. While GitLab offers a flexible hosting approach, robust version control, and strong integration options, YouTrack excels in project management capabilities and provides a more traditional approach to issue tracking. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, YouTrack

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
YouTrack
YouTrack

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

A project management tool that can be adapted to your processes to help you deliver great products. Track tasks and bugs, plan sprints and releases, create workflows, and customize for your business processes.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Agile Boards; Reports; Dashboards; Smart search; Commands and shortcuts; Import from Jira
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
238
Followers
54.5K
Followers
185
Votes
2.5K
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 2
    Cheap and well featured
  • 0
    Cheap
  • 0
    Good looking, well done, comfortable
Cons
  • 1
    Poor ecosystem integrations (ex. Slack)
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Zendesk
Zendesk
TeamCity
TeamCity
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to GitLab, YouTrack?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Jira

Jira

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana