StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs WakaTime

GitLab vs WakaTime

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
WakaTime
WakaTime
Stacks156
Followers158
Votes52

GitLab vs WakaTime: What are the differences?

## Introduction

GitLab and WakaTime are two popular tools that serve different purposes in the software development process. Here are key differences between GitLab and WakaTime:

1. **Primary Functionality**: GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps platform that provides a repository manager, CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, and more, all in one integrated solution. It facilitates collaboration among development teams and helps manage the entire software development lifecycle. On the other hand, WakaTime is a code time tracking tool that integrates with various code editors to track time spent coding, provide insights into productivity, and help developers improve their coding habits.

2. **Focus on Collaboration vs. Individual Productivity**: GitLab focuses on enabling collaboration and coordination among team members by providing tools for version control, issue tracking, code review, and project management. It emphasizes team productivity and streamlining workflows. In contrast, WakaTime is more geared towards individual productivity, offering insights into personal coding habits, time management, and helping developers stay focused on their tasks.

3. **Scope of Integration**: GitLab offers a wide range of integrations with other tools and services commonly used in the software development process, such as Docker, Kubernetes, Slack, and Jira. It aims to provide a seamless experience by connecting various tools and streamlining workflows. WakaTime, on the other hand, primarily focuses on integrating with code editors like Visual Studio Code, Sublime Text, and PyCharm to track coding time and provide productivity metrics directly within the developer's workflow.

4. **Pricing Model**: GitLab offers a range of pricing plans, including a free tier for small teams and a paid tier for larger organizations with additional features and support. The pricing is based on the number of users and storage requirements. WakaTime also offers a free tier with basic features but follows a subscription-based model for advanced features such as detailed reports, goal tracking, and integrations with project management tools.

5. **Support and Community**: GitLab has a large and active community of developers and contributors who actively participate in improving the platform, sharing knowledge, and providing support. It also offers comprehensive documentation and support resources for users. In comparison, WakaTime focuses more on providing direct support to individual users through its customer support channels, with a smaller emphasis on community interaction.

6. **Customizability and Extensibility**: GitLab allows for extensive customization and configuration options, enabling users to tailor the platform to their specific needs and workflows. It supports self-hosted deployment for organizations that require complete control over their infrastructure. WakaTime, on the other hand, offers fewer customization options as it primarily focuses on providing a streamlined experience for tracking coding time and productivity insights within code editors.

In Summary, GitLab and WakaTime differ in their primary functionality, focus on collaboration vs. individual productivity, scope of integration, pricing model, support and community, and customizability and extensibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, WakaTime

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
WakaTime
WakaTime

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Quantify your coding - open source plugins for automatic time tracking & insights into your programming.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Fully automatic, with reports via email;Find the time you spend per feature/commit;See time spent in each language;Branch-level stats; File-level stats;Slack integration for team collaboration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
156
Followers
54.5K
Followers
158
Votes
2.5K
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 17
    Automatic time tracking per project
  • 12
    It's a great way to manage my time
  • 8
    Time log next to each commit on GitHub
  • 5
    Productivity
  • 5
    Big choice of supported IDEs
Cons
  • 1
    Slow down the IDE
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Eclipse
Eclipse
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Vim
Vim
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Atom
Atom
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
RubyMine
RubyMine

What are some alternatives to GitLab, WakaTime?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana