StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs Redmine

GitLab vs Redmine

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Redmine
Redmine
Stacks590
Followers436
Votes129
GitHub Stars5.8K
Forks2.4K

GitLab vs Redmine: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and Redmine are two popular project management tools that are widely used in software development teams. While both tools offer similar features such as issue tracking, version control, and collaboration, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration with Version Control: GitLab is primarily a version control system and provides a seamless integration with the Git repository. It offers a wide range of features for source code management and collaboration, including branch management, merge requests, and continuous integration. On the other hand, Redmine is more focused on project management and does not have extensive version control capabilities. While it does provide integration with different version control systems like Git and Subversion, it lacks advanced features that are available in GitLab.

  2. Issue Tracking and Workflow: GitLab has a built-in issue tracking system that allows teams to effectively manage and track their tasks and bugs. It provides a customizable workflow with built-in labels, milestones, and assignees, making it easier for teams to collaborate and prioritize their work. Redmine also offers an issue tracking system but allows for more flexibility in defining custom workflows and issue statuses. It provides a wider range of customization options, but this can make it more complex to set up and maintain.

  3. User Interface and Usability: GitLab has a modern and intuitive user interface that is designed to be user-friendly and accessible for both developers and non-technical users. It provides a consistent experience across different devices and platforms, making it easier for teams to collaborate and work remotely. On the other hand, Redmine has a more traditional and less user-friendly interface, which can be overwhelming for new users. It requires a certain level of technical expertise to navigate and use effectively.

  4. Built-in Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): GitLab is known for its powerful built-in CI/CD capabilities, allowing teams to automate their build, test, and deployment processes. It provides a comprehensive set of tools and features for continuous integration and delivery, making it easier for teams to streamline their development workflow. Redmine, on the other hand, does not have built-in CI/CD capabilities and requires integration with external tools for automating the development pipeline.

  5. Community and Support: GitLab has a large and active community of users and developers, which provides a wealth of resources, documentation, and support. It has an open-source version available, which allows for customization and community contributions. Redmine also has an active community, but it is relatively smaller compared to GitLab. It has a limited number of plugins and extensions available, making it less flexible in terms of customization and integration with third-party tools.

  6. Scalability and Performance: GitLab is designed to handle large-scale projects and can easily scale to support thousands of users and repositories. It provides high availability and performance, making it suitable for enterprise-level deployments. Redmine, on the other hand, may face scalability issues when used in large projects with a high number of users and issues. It may require additional configuration and optimization to ensure optimal performance.

In summary, GitLab is more focused on version control and provides extensive features for source code management and collaboration. It has a modern user interface, built-in CI/CD capabilities, and a large community for support. On the other hand, Redmine is more focused on project management and offers more customization options for workflows and issue tracking. It has a traditional interface, requires external tools for CI/CD, and may face scalability issues in large projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Redmine

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Redmine
Redmine

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Multiple projects support;Flexible role based access control;Flexible issue tracking system;Gantt chart and calendar;News, documents & files management;Feeds & email notifications;Per project wiki;Per project forums;Time tracking;Custom fields for issues, time-entries, projects and users;SCM integration (SVN, CVS, Git, Mercurial, Bazaar and Darcs);Issue creation via email;Multiple LDAP authentication support;User self-registration support;Multilanguage support;Multiple databases support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
5.8K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
2.4K
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
590
Followers
54.5K
Followers
436
Votes
2.5K
Votes
129
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 54
    Open source
  • 27
    Customizable with themes and plugins
  • 10
    Integration with code version control like git/svn
  • 9
    Powerful custom queries
  • 6
    Customizable workflows

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Redmine?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Asana

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Basecamp

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Confluence

Confluence

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana