Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GitKraken vs SmartGit: What are the differences?
Introduction
GitKraken and SmartGit are both popular Git clients that provide a graphical user interface (GUI) for managing Git repositories. While they share some similarities, there are also key differences between the two.
Interface: GitKraken offers a sleek and visually appealing interface, with a modern design that appeals to many users. On the other hand, SmartGit has a more traditional and functional interface that may be preferred by users who prioritize simplicity and efficiency.
Integration and Compatibility: GitKraken seamlessly integrates with popular code hosting platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, making it easy to connect and collaborate with remote repositories. SmartGit also supports integration with these platforms, but it offers additional compatibility with other version control systems like Mercurial and Subversion, making it a more versatile option for developers working with multiple VCSs.
Branch Visualization: GitKraken provides an intuitive and interactive branch visualization tool that allows users to easily understand complex branching structures and trace commits. SmartGit, on the other hand, offers a simpler branch visualization that focuses more on the commit history, making it suitable for users who prefer a more straightforward representation of their Git history.
Performance: GitKraken is known for its speed and responsiveness, with optimized performance that allows for efficient repository management, especially when dealing with large repositories. SmartGit also offers decent performance, but it may not be as fast and smooth as GitKraken when handling resource-intensive operations or repositories with a large number of files.
Pricing and Licensing: GitKraken offers both free and paid versions, with the paid version unlocking additional features and support. SmartGit follows a similar model, offering a free version for non-commercial use and paid licenses for commercial use or if you require advanced features like code review integration or customizable templates.
User Community and Support: GitKraken boasts a large and active user community, with regular updates, feature enhancements, and strong customer support. SmartGit's user community may not be as extensive, but they provide responsive customer support, including direct assistance via email or their support forum.
In summary, GitKraken and SmartGit have their own strengths and features that cater to different needs. GitKraken excels in its visually appealing interface and robust integration with popular code hosting platforms, while SmartGit offers additional compatibility with other version control systems and a more straightforward branch visualization. The choice between the two ultimately depends on individual preferences and specific requirements.
Pros of GitKraken
- Dark theme59
- Best linux git client34
- Great overview29
- Full featured client21
- Gitflow support20
- Beautiful UI19
- Very easy to use18
- Graph16
- Works great on both linux and windows13
- Effortless13
- Easy Merge Conflict Tool6
- Amazing Github and Bitbucket integration5
- Great UX4
- Integration with GitHub3
- Automatic Repo Discovery3
- Submodule support3
- Easy to Learn and Setup3
- Super fast3
- Fuzzy find (CTRL P)2
- Very user friendly1
- Much more stable than source tree1
- Great for non-dev users1
- Because it has Linux client1
- Command palette (CTRL Shift P)1
Pros of SmartGit
- Dark theme2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GitKraken
- Extremely slow when working with large repositories3
- No edit/fixup in interactive rebase3
- Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)3
- Not as many features as sourcetree2
- Do not allow to directly edit staging area2
- Does not work like a Mac app2
Cons of SmartGit
- Non-intuitive actions1
- Bugs1