Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GitHub Enterprise vs Gitea: What are the differences?
Introduction
GitHub Enterprise and Gitea are both version control systems that allow teams to collaborate on code. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between them.
Scalability: GitHub Enterprise is designed for enterprise-level organizations with larger teams and complex workflows. It offers advanced features and can handle a high volume of users and repositories. On the other hand, Gitea is lightweight and more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers.
Cost: GitHub Enterprise is a commercial product and requires a license to use. The pricing depends on the number of users and repositories, and it can be expensive for larger organizations. Gitea, on the other hand, is open source and completely free to use. This makes it a more cost-effective option for small teams or businesses with budget constraints.
Customizability: GitHub Enterprise provides extensive customization options, allowing organizations to tailor it to their specific needs. It offers integration with various third-party tools and services, such as project management or continuous integration tools. Gitea, while also customizable, has fewer integrations available and may not offer the same level of flexibility.
Security: GitHub Enterprise offers advanced security features, including enterprise-level authentication and access controls. It also provides security auditing and monitoring tools to ensure the safety of sensitive code. Gitea, while having some security features, may not be as robust in comparison, especially for organizations with stricter security requirements.
Support and Documentation: GitHub Enterprise offers comprehensive support and documentation, including access to GitHub's extensive knowledge base and community forums. It also provides enterprise-level support for customers. Gitea, being an open-source project, may have limited official support options. However, there is an active community that can provide assistance and guidance.
Platform Compatibility: GitHub Enterprise is compatible with various platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It also integrates well with other GitHub services and tools. Gitea, while also compatible with multiple platforms, may have less extensive integration options and may require additional configuration for certain platforms.
In Summary, GitHub Enterprise is a scalable and customizable solution suitable for large organizations with more complex needs and budgets, while Gitea is a lightweight and cost-effective option for smaller teams or individual developers.
We are using a Bitbucket server, and due to migration efforts and new Atlassian community license changes, we need to move to a new self-hosted solution. The new data-center license for Atlassian, available in February, will be community provisioned (free). Along with that community license, other technologies will be coming with it (Crucible, Confluence, and Jira). Is there value in a paid-for license to get the GitHub Enterprise? Are the tools that come with it worth the cost?
I know it is about $20 per 10 seats, and we have about 300 users. Have other convertees to Microsoft's tools found it easy to do a migration? Is the toolset that much more beneficial to the free suite that one can get from Atlassian?
So far, free seems to be the winner, and the familiarization with Atlassian implementation and maintenance is understood. Going to GitHub, are there any distinct challenges to be found or any perks to be attained?
These are pretty competitive, and to recommend one over the other would require understanding your usage. Also, what other tools you use: for instance, what do you use for Issue-tracking, or for build pipelines. In your case, since you are already using Bitbucket, the question would be: do you have any current pain-points? And, on the other hand, do you already use Atlassian's JIRA, where you'd benefit from the tight integration? So, though I would not recommend one over the other just in general,. But, if Bitbucket fulfills your current use-cases, then there seems to be little motivation to move.
Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.
Pros of Gitea
- Self-hosted24
- Lightweight16
- Free15
- Simple12
- Easy Setup9
- Multiple code maintainers9
- Pull requests and code reviews6
- Squash and Merge is supported5
- Written in Go5
- Import existing git repositories5
- Nice gui4
- Run in Raspberry Pi3
- Community-fork of Gogs2
- LDAP Support2
- ๐ฃ โช๐ขโช๐โช๐ขโช๐ฃ1
- Gitea Actions(Github compatible)1
- โโ๐ฃ โช๐ขโช๐โช๐ขโช๐ฃ โโโโโ1
- Richable Packages1
- ๐ฃ โช๐ขโช๐โช๐ขโช๐ฃ1
- โ๐ฃ โช๐ขโช๐โช๐ขโช๐ฃ โโโโ1
- ๐ฃ โช๐ขโช๐โช๐ขโช๐ฃ0
Pros of GitHub Enterprise
- Expensive - $$$4
- Code security2
- CDCI with Github Actions2
- Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available1
- Draft Pull Request1
- User experience0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Gitea
- Community-fork of Gogs3
- Easy Windows authentication is not supported0
Cons of GitHub Enterprise
- $$$2