StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. Git vs Gitless

Git vs Gitless

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Git
Git
Stacks343.7K
Followers184.2K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars57.1K
Forks26.9K
Gitless
Gitless
Stacks4
Followers18
Votes0

Git vs Gitless: What are the differences?

Introduction

Git and Gitless are both version control systems used for managing and tracking changes to files in software development projects. Although they serve the same purpose, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Integration with existing Git workflows: Git integrates seamlessly with existing Git workflows and allows developers to use Git commands directly. In contrast, Gitless provides a simplified subset of Git commands and introduces new commands that attempt to make the version control process more intuitive and user-friendly.

  2. Explicit commits and branches: Git requires developers to explicitly create commits and branches, making it easier to track changes and manage work in progress. Gitless, on the other hand, follows a more implicit approach by automatically committing changes and creating temporary branches, which may confuse some users accustomed to the explicit nature of Git.

  3. Simplified commit history: Gitless provides a simplified and linear commit history by automatically squashing multiple commits into a single commit. This can help to make the commit history cleaner and easier to understand. In contrast, Git retains the full commit history, including all individual commits, providing a more detailed overview of the development process.

  4. Reversible operations: Gitless introduces reversible operations, allowing users to easily undo changes without the need for complex Git commands. This can be particularly useful for beginners or individuals who are not familiar with the intricacies of Git's revert and reset commands.

  5. Built-in staging area: Git includes a staging area that allows developers to selectively stage changes before committing them. Gitless simplifies this process by automatically staging all changes, eliminating the need for manual staging. While this reduces complexity, it also removes the flexibility and granularity offered by Git's staging area.

  6. Collaboration with Git users: Gitless is designed to be compatible with Git, meaning that Git users can interact with Gitless repositories and vice versa. This allows for collaboration between teams using different version control systems, making it easier to work together on projects.

In Summary, Git and Gitless differ in their integration with existing Git workflows, the explicitness of commits and branches, the handling of commit history, the availability of reversible operations, the presence of a staging area, and the compatibility with Git.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Git, Gitless

Kamaldeep
Kamaldeep

CEO at Zhoustify Agency

Nov 13, 2020

Decided

SVN is much simpler than git for the simple stuff (checking in files and updating them when everyone's online), and much more complex than git for the complicated stuff (branching and merging). Or put another way, git's learning curve is steep up front, and then increases moderately as you do weird things; SVN's learning curve is very shallow up front and then increases rapidly.

If you're storing large files, if you're not branching, if you're not storing source code, and if your team is happy with SVN and the workflow you have, I'd say you should stay on SVN.

If you're writing source code with a relatively modern development practice (developers doing local builds and tests, pre-commit code reviews, preferably automated testing, preferably some amount of open-source code), you should move to git for two reasons: first, this style of working inherently requires frequent branching and merging, and second, your ability to interact with outside projects is easier if you're all comfortable with git instead of snapshotting the outside project into SVN.

83.3k views83.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Git
Git
Gitless
Gitless

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Gitless is an experiment to see what happens if you put a simple veneer on an app that changes the underlying concepts. Because Gitless is implemented on top of Git (could be considered what Git pros call a "porcelain" of Git), you can always fall back on Git.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
26.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
343.7K
Stacks
4
Followers
184.2K
Followers
18
Votes
6.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1429
    Distributed version control system
  • 1053
    Efficient branching and merging
  • 959
    Fast
  • 843
    Open source
  • 726
    Better than svn
Cons
  • 16
    Hard to learn
  • 11
    Inconsistent command line interface
  • 9
    Easy to lose uncommitted work
  • 8
    Worst documentation ever possibly made
  • 5
    Awful merge handling
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Git, Gitless?

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

SVN (Subversion)

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.

Pijul

Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.

DVC

DVC

It is an open-source Version Control System for data science and machine learning projects. It is designed to handle large files, data sets, machine learning models, and metrics as well as code.

Magit

Magit

It is an interface to the version control system Git, implemented as an Emacs package. It aspires to be a complete Git porcelain. While we cannot (yet) claim that it wraps and improves upon each and every Git command, it is complete enough to allow even experienced Git users to perform almost all of their daily version control tasks directly from within Emacs. While many fine Git clients exist, only deserve to be called porcelains.

Replicate

Replicate

It lets you run machine learning models with a few lines of code, without needing to understand how machine learning works.

isomorphic-git

isomorphic-git

It is a pure JavaScript reimplementation of git that works in both Node.js and browser JavaScript environments. It can read and write to git repositories, fetch from and push to git remotes (such as GitHub), all without any native C++ module dependencies.

Git Reflow

Git Reflow

Reflow automatically creates pull requests, ensures the code review is approved, and squash merges finished branches to master with a great commit message template.

BitKeeper

BitKeeper

BitKeeper is a fast, enterprise-ready, distributed SCM that scales up to very large projects and down to tiny ones.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana