Git-appraise vs Gitcolony

Overview

Gitcolony

Stacks1

Followers21

Votes0

Git-appraise

Stacks4

Followers27

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks143

Git-appraise vs Gitcolony: What are the differences?

Git-appraise and Gitcolony are two popular tools used for code review and collaboration in Git repositories. Key differences between Git-appraise and Gitcolony are:

Workflow Integration: Git-appraise integrates directly into the Git workflow by leveraging Git's branching model, while Gitcolony provides a centralized platform for code review and collaboration separate from the Git repository.
Scalability: Git-appraise is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams or individual developers working on open-source projects, whereas Gitcolony is designed for larger teams and enterprises requiring advanced collaboration features and scalability.
Feature Set: Git-appraise focuses on providing essential code review features such as comments, approvals, and feedback within Git repositories, while Gitcolony offers a broader feature set including task management, metrics, and integration with popular project management tools.
Customization Options: Git-appraise offers limited customization options for code review workflows and policies, whereas Gitcolony allows users to define custom rules, workflows, and roles based on their specific requirements.
Ease of Use: Git-appraise is more lightweight and simple to set up, making it ideal for individual developers and small teams looking for a streamlined code review process, while Gitcolony may require more configuration and training due to its advanced features and capabilities.
Pricing Model: Git-appraise is typically free and open-source, whereas Gitcolony offers different pricing tiers based on the number of users and features required, making it more suitable for organizations with budget considerations.

In Summary, Git-appraise and Gitcolony differ in terms of workflow integration, scalability, feature set, customization options, ease of use, and pricing model, catering to different needs and preferences in code review and collaboration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gitcolony	Git-appraise
Gitcolony encourages developers to share early feedback, do partial reviews, reduce rework and leverage the knowledge of the whole group. Teams become more efficient by adding visibility to the process.	This is a distributed code review system for Git. Code reviews are stored inside the repository as git objects that can be pushed and pulled to remote repos. When pulling, updates from the remote are automatically merged by the tool.
set up and enforce your own custom rules to keep your code quality under control. Gitcolony helps you reinforce your code review policies and best practices your team follows informally; collaborate with your team in real time, performing progressive checks to avoid titanic reviews; encourage software developers with performance rankings and gamification techniques; integrate QA and development processes to minimize coordination friction between both teams;	Code review requests; Continuous integration status; Robot comments (generated by static analysis tool); Review comments (generated by person)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 143
Stacks 1	Stacks 4
Followers 21	Followers 27
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Jenkins Slack Git GitHub Enterprise Jira GitHub Bitbucket HipChat	Git Jenkins Eclipse GitHub Phabricator

What are some alternatives to Gitcolony, Git-appraise?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Git-appraise vs Gitcolony: What are the differences?

Git-appraise and Gitcolony are two popular tools used for code review and collaboration in Git repositories. Key differences between Git-appraise and Gitcolony are:

Workflow Integration: Git-appraise integrates directly into the Git workflow by leveraging Git's branching model, while Gitcolony provides a centralized platform for code review and collaboration separate from the Git repository.
Scalability: Git-appraise is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams or individual developers working on open-source projects, whereas Gitcolony is designed for larger teams and enterprises requiring advanced collaboration features and scalability.
Feature Set: Git-appraise focuses on providing essential code review features such as comments, approvals, and feedback within Git repositories, while Gitcolony offers a broader feature set including task management, metrics, and integration with popular project management tools.
Customization Options: Git-appraise offers limited customization options for code review workflows and policies, whereas Gitcolony allows users to define custom rules, workflows, and roles based on their specific requirements.
Ease of Use: Git-appraise is more lightweight and simple to set up, making it ideal for individual developers and small teams looking for a streamlined code review process, while Gitcolony may require more configuration and training due to its advanced features and capabilities.
Pricing Model: Git-appraise is typically free and open-source, whereas Gitcolony offers different pricing tiers based on the number of users and features required, making it more suitable for organizations with budget considerations.

Git-appraise vs Gitcolony

Overview