StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs Scrutinizer

Gerrit Code Review vs Scrutinizer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Scrutinizer
Scrutinizer
Stacks94
Followers64
Votes20
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Scrutinizer: What are the differences?

Developers describe Gerrit Code Review as "OpenSource Git Code Review Tool". Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more. On the other hand, Scrutinizer is detailed as "Continuous inspection platform - improve code quality and find bugs before they hit production". Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.

Gerrit Code Review and Scrutinizer can be primarily classified as "Code Review" tools.

Some of the features offered by Gerrit Code Review are:

  • git repository hosting
  • pre-commit code review
  • commenting on diffs

On the other hand, Scrutinizer provides the following key features:

  • Continuously measure and track your code quality
  • Project quality broken down
  • Know your problem areas

"Code review" is the primary reason why developers consider Gerrit Code Review over the competitors, whereas "Github integration / sync" was stated as the key factor in picking Scrutinizer.

LinkORB, TheIconic, and OSInet are some of the popular companies that use Scrutinizer, whereas Gerrit Code Review is used by Citrix, Midokura, and Wonga.com. Scrutinizer has a broader approval, being mentioned in 17 company stacks & 7 developers stacks; compared to Gerrit Code Review, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Scrutinizer
Scrutinizer
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

Scrutinizer is a continuous inspection platform helping you to create better software.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Continuously measure and track your code quality;Project quality broken down;Know your problem areas;Works fine with legacy code bases
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
94
Stacks
116
Followers
64
Followers
223
Votes
20
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Github integration / sync
  • 4
    Bitbucket integration / sync
  • 2
    Gitlab integration / sync
  • 2
    Private Git repo sync
  • 1
    Python inspection
Cons
  • 1
    Pricing
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Scrutinizer, Gerrit Code Review?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana