StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs Phabricator

Gerrit Code Review vs Phabricator

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phabricator
Phabricator
Stacks221
Followers323
Votes187
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Phabricator: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Here, we will discuss the key differences between Gerrit Code Review and Phabricator, two popular code review tools used in the software development industry.

  1. Integration with Git: Gerrit Code Review is tightly integrated with Git, making it a popular choice for teams utilizing Git as their version control system. On the other hand, Phabricator supports multiple version control systems, including Git, Mercurial, and Subversion, providing more flexibility for teams using different version control systems.

  2. User Interface: Gerrit Code Review provides a simple and minimalistic user interface, focusing primarily on the code review process. In contrast, Phabricator offers a more comprehensive user interface with additional features, such as task management, project management, and documentation, making it a versatile tool for both code review and project management.

  3. Workflow: Gerrit Code Review follows a stricter workflow, where developers submit changesets for review, which then go through a series of approvals and reworks before being merged into the codebase. Phabricator, on the other hand, offers a more flexible workflow that allows users to create different review and approval processes based on their team's needs.

  4. Extensibility: Phabricator is known for its extensibility, with a wide range of built-in and third-party extensions available to enhance its functionality. Gerrit Code Review, although extensible, may not provide as many options for customizations and integrations compared to Phabricator.

  5. Code Browsing: Gerrit Code Review focuses primarily on code review, providing features like side-by-side code diffs, inline comments, and code history. Phabricator, on the other hand, offers additional code browsing capabilities, including code search, browsing through repository history, and visualization of code ownership.

  6. Integration with CI/CD: Phabricator provides native integration with various Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) systems, such as Jenkins, allowing seamless integration of code review with the deployment process. While Gerrit Code Review also supports CI/CD integration, it may require more customization or additional plugins to achieve similar functionality.

In summary, Gerrit Code Review is a tightly integrated and streamlined code review tool with a focus on Git integration and code review process, whereas Phabricator offers a more comprehensive platform with additional project management features, support for multiple version control systems, and extensibility through various built-in and third-party extensions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phabricator
Phabricator
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

reviewing code before it hits master; auditing code after it hits master; hosting Git/Hg/SVN repositories; tracking bugs or "features"; counting down to HL3; expounding liberal tomes of text; nit picking pixels with designers; "project" "manage" "ment"; hiding stuff from coworkers; and also other random things, like memes, badges, and tokens.
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
221
Stacks
116
Followers
323
Followers
223
Votes
187
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Open Source
  • 29
    Code Review
  • 25
    Supports Git/Hg/SVN
  • 18
    Bug Tracking
  • 17
    Audit Source Code
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
  • 10
    Open source
Integrations
Asana
Asana
Jira
Jira
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Phabricator, Gerrit Code Review?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana