Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Fork vs SmartGit: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In this markdown code, I will provide the key differences between Fork and SmartGit, two popular version control systems.
1. Fork vs SmartGit: Integration with GitHub
Fork integrates seamlessly with GitHub, providing a convenient way to clone, commit, and push changes to a GitHub repository. SmartGit, on the other hand, also supports GitHub integration but offers additional features like managing pull requests and browsing and checking out remote branches.
2. Fork vs SmartGit: User Interface
Fork has a simple and intuitive user interface, making it easy for beginners to understand and use. SmartGit, however, has a more complex and advanced user interface, which may be more suitable for experienced users who require more control and customization options.
3. Fork vs SmartGit: Branching and Merging
Fork offers a streamlined and straightforward approach to branching and merging, allowing users to create and manage branches with ease. SmartGit, on the other hand, provides more advanced options for branching and merging, including support for complex merge scenarios and visual representation of merge conflicts.
4. Fork vs SmartGit: Stashing Changes
Fork allows users to stash their changes temporarily, which can be helpful when switching between different tasks or branches. SmartGit, on the other hand, provides more advanced stashing options, including the ability to stash and apply changes selectively and manage multiple stashes simultaneously.
5. Fork vs SmartGit: Gitflow Workflow Support
Fork provides built-in support for the Gitflow workflow, a branching model for larger projects that involves the creation of feature branches, release branches, and hotfix branches. SmartGit also supports the Gitflow workflow but offers additional features like branch graph visualizations and automated branch management.
6. Fork vs SmartGit: Price and Licensing
Fork is a commercial product and requires a paid license for full functionality. SmartGit, on the other hand, offers both free and paid versions, providing a more flexible option for users with different needs and budgets.
In Summary, Fork and SmartGit differ in their integration with GitHub, user interface, branching and merging capabilities, stashing changes options, Gitflow workflow support, as well as pricing and licensing.
I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.
It allows * to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie) * it helps to investigate the history * most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
Pros of Fork
- One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs19
- Nice UX14
- Does the job way better than others13
- Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast13
- Dark theme11
- Intuitive interactive rebase and conflict resolution UI9
- Gitflow support9
- Excellent commit history tree view7
- This even looks the same as SourceTree5
- Repository Manager4
- Built-in developer feedback3
- Countless quality of life features3
- Github Notifications2
- Not buggy, works smoothly2
- Keyaboard-only2
- Visual branch history2
- Reflog support2
- Git ammend1
- Smart 'Open in' menu; e.g. explorer, bit, giithub .1
- Interactive rebase window1
- Native application1
- Intuitive merge conflict resolution1
- Unique Activity Manager shows current/past operations1
Pros of SmartGit
- Dark theme2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Fork
- Poorly written license2
- Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history1
- Merges that require interactive user decision1
Cons of SmartGit
- Non-intuitive actions1
- Bugs1