Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Fork vs PhantomJS: What are the differences?
Developers describe Fork as "Fast and Friendly Git Client for Mac". Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly. On the other hand, PhantomJS is detailed as "Scriptable Headless WebKit". PhantomJS (www.phantomjs.org) is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.
Fork can be classified as a tool in the "Source Code Management Desktop Apps" category, while PhantomJS is grouped under "Headless Browsers".
"One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs" is the top reason why over 6 developers like Fork, while over 12 developers mention "Scriptable web browser" as the leading cause for choosing PhantomJS.
PhantomJS is an open source tool with 26.9K GitHub stars and 5.7K GitHub forks. Here's a link to PhantomJS's open source repository on GitHub.
Key Location, Indiegogo, and Tailor Brands are some of the popular companies that use PhantomJS, whereas Fork is used by JustWatch, Lancaster Solutions, and Center for Open Science. PhantomJS has a broader approval, being mentioned in 77 company stacks & 47 developers stacks; compared to Fork, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 7 developer stacks.
I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?
You better go with puppeteer. It is basically chrome automation tool, written in nodejs. So what you get is PDF, generated by chrome itself. I guess there is hardly better PDF generation tool for the web. Phantomjs is already more or less outdated as technology. It uses some old webkit port that's quite behind in terms of standards and features. It can be replaced with puppeteer for every single task.
I suggest puppeteer to go for. It is simple and easy to set up. Only limitaiton is it can be used only for chrome browser and currently they are looking into expanding into FF. The next thing is Playwright which is just a scale up of Puppeteer. It supports cross browsers.
I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.
It allows * to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie) * it helps to investigate the history * most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
Pros of Fork
- One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs18
- Nice UX13
- Does the job way better than others12
- Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast12
- Dark theme10
- Intuitive interactive rebase and conflict resolution UI9
- Gitflow support9
- Excellent commit history tree view7
- This even looks the same as SourceTree5
- Repository Manager4
- Countless quality of life features3
- Built-in developer feedback3
- Not buggy, works smoothly2
- Keyaboard-only2
- Visual branch history2
- Reflog support2
- Github Notifications2
- Git ammend1
- Smart 'Open in' menu; e.g. explorer, bit, giithub .1
- Native application1
- Interactive rebase window1
- Intuitive merge conflict resolution1
- Unique Activity Manager shows current/past operations1
Pros of PhantomJS
- Scriptable web browser13
- Depends on QT3
- No ECMAScript 62
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Fork
- Poorly written license2
- Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history1
- Merges that require interactive user decision1