Forestry vs Netlify CMS

Overview

Netlify CMS

Stacks523

Followers565

Votes6

Forestry

Stacks96

Followers129

Votes0

Forestry vs Netlify CMS: What are the differences?

**Introduction**

**1. Integration with Static Site Generators**: Forestry is known for its seamless integration with static site generators, allowing users to edit content directly within their preferred generator. On the other hand, Netlify CMS is a standalone platform that requires a separate hosting provider.

**2. User Interface Design**: Forestry offers a more user-friendly and intuitive interface with features like drag-and-drop functionality and live preview options. In contrast, Netlify CMS has a simpler interface, which may be preferred by users looking for a more streamlined experience.

**3. Collaborative Editing**: Forestry allows multiple users to collaborate on content creation and editing, with the ability to track changes and manage workflows. Netlify CMS, on the other hand, lacks robust collaboration features and is more suited for individual users or small teams.

**4. Customization and Extensibility**: Forestry provides more flexibility in terms of customization and extensibility through various plugins and integrations. Netlify CMS, while offering some customization options, may be limited in its ability to cater to complex or unique requirements.

**5. Preview and Deployment Options**: Forestry offers a built-in preview feature that allows users to see how their content will look once published, as well as seamless deployment options to various hosting providers. Netlify CMS also offers preview functionality but may not be as versatile in deployment options.

**6. Pricing Structure**: Forestry and Netlify CMS have different pricing models, with Forestry offering a free tier for personal use and scalable plans for teams and businesses. Netlify CMS, on the other hand, is included in the Netlify hosting platform, which has its pricing based on usage and features.

In Summary, the key differences between Forestry and Netlify CMS lie in their integration with static site generators, user interface design, collaborative editing capabilities, customization and extensibility, preview and deployment options, and pricing structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Netlify CMS	Forestry
It is built as a single-page React app. You can create custom-styled previews, UI widgets, and editor plugins or add backends to support different Git platform APIs.	It is a simple Git-based CMS for Jekyll and Hugo sites. Built for devs who hate bloat. It helps developers manage a content-based system into their websites seamlessly and there's also the benefits of collaborating with teams while at it.
Fast, web-based UI; platform agnostic; easy install; oaut2 and jwt; flexible content types; fully extensible	jekyll; hugo; cms; git
Statistics
Stacks 523	Stacks 96
Followers 565	Followers 129
Votes 6	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Open source 2 Free 1 GraphQL API Cons 2 No relations between items	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React Gatsby	HTML5 Bitbucket Netlify GitHub

What are some alternatives to Netlify CMS, Forestry?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

Forestry vs Netlify CMS: What are the differences?

**Introduction**

**1. Integration with Static Site Generators**: Forestry is known for its seamless integration with static site generators, allowing users to edit content directly within their preferred generator. On the other hand, Netlify CMS is a standalone platform that requires a separate hosting provider.

**2. User Interface Design**: Forestry offers a more user-friendly and intuitive interface with features like drag-and-drop functionality and live preview options. In contrast, Netlify CMS has a simpler interface, which may be preferred by users looking for a more streamlined experience.

**3. Collaborative Editing**: Forestry allows multiple users to collaborate on content creation and editing, with the ability to track changes and manage workflows. Netlify CMS, on the other hand, lacks robust collaboration features and is more suited for individual users or small teams.

**4. Customization and Extensibility**: Forestry provides more flexibility in terms of customization and extensibility through various plugins and integrations. Netlify CMS, while offering some customization options, may be limited in its ability to cater to complex or unique requirements.

**5. Preview and Deployment Options**: Forestry offers a built-in preview feature that allows users to see how their content will look once published, as well as seamless deployment options to various hosting providers. Netlify CMS also offers preview functionality but may not be as versatile in deployment options.

**6. Pricing Structure**: Forestry and Netlify CMS have different pricing models, with Forestry offering a free tier for personal use and scalable plans for teams and businesses. Netlify CMS, on the other hand, is included in the Netlify hosting platform, which has its pricing based on usage and features.

Forestry vs Netlify CMS

Overview