StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Flight vs React vs Vue.js

Flight vs React vs Vue.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Flight
Flight
Stacks15
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.5K
Forks542
Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K

Flight vs React vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Flight, React, and Vue.js are all popular frontend JavaScript frameworks used for building web applications. Each framework has its own set of features and advantages.

  1. Performance: React and Vue.js utilize a Virtual DOM to optimize rendering performance by updating only the components that have changed, while Flight focuses on simplicity and lightweight code, which may result in better performance in some cases.

  2. Learning Curve: React has a steeper learning curve due to its JSX syntax and concepts like state and props, while Vue.js offers a more gradual learning curve with its simpler templating syntax and clear documentation. Flight, on the other hand, is designed to be minimalistic and intuitive, making it easier for beginners to grasp.

  3. State Management: React relies on external libraries like Redux or Context API for state management, offering a more flexible and scalable solution, while Vue.js provides built-in reactivity for managing state within components. Flight does not impose any specific state management solution, allowing developers to choose what fits best for their project.

  4. Component Composition: React and Vue.js have a similar component-based architecture, allowing developers to create reusable and encapsulated components easily. Flight provides a more lightweight approach to component creation, focusing on event-driven architecture without the concept of components.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: React has a vast and active community with a rich ecosystem of third-party libraries and tools, making it ideal for large-scale projects. Vue.js, although growing rapidly, has a smaller community compared to React but offers a more cohesive ecosystem with official libraries like Vuex for state management. Flight has a smaller community and a limited set of external resources due to its less popular status.

  6. Flexibility and Extensibility: React provides a high degree of flexibility with its unopinionated nature, allowing developers to make decisions on tooling, project structure, and state management. Vue.js strikes a balance between flexibility and opinionation, offering built-in solutions for common tasks while allowing customization. Flight prioritizes simplicity and freedom from restrictions, offering developers complete control over the architecture and design of their applications.

In Summary, Flight, React, and Vue.js differ in terms of performance optimization, learning curve, state management approaches, component composition, community support, and flexibility in architecture. Each framework caters to different preferences and project requirements, offering unique solutions for frontend development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Flight, Vue.js

John Clifford
John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k
Comments
Máté
Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Flight
Flight
Vue.js
Vue.js

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Flight is distinct from existing frameworks in that it doesn't prescribe or provide any particular approach to rendering or providing data to a web application. It's agnostic to how requests are routed, which templating language you use or even if you render your HTML on the client or the server. While some web frameworks encourage developers to arrange their code around a prescribed model layer, Flight is organized around the existing DOM model with functionality mapped directly to DOM nodes.

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
6.5K
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
542
GitHub Forks
33.8K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
15
Stacks
55.5K
Followers
147.0K
Followers
19
Followers
44.7K
Votes
4.1K
Votes
0
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes

What are some alternatives to React, Flight, Vue.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase