Flask vs Phoenix Framework

Overview

Flask

Stacks19.3K

Followers16.2K

Votes60

Phoenix Framework

Stacks1.0K

Followers1.0K

Votes678

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks3.0K

Flask vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

Flask

Flask is a popular Python web framework that allows developers to build web applications quickly and easily.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework is a web framework implemented in Elixir, a functional programming language that runs on the Erlang VM.

Key Differences between Flask and Phoenix Framework

Language: The most obvious difference between Flask and Phoenix Framework is the programming language they are built on. Flask uses Python, while Phoenix Framework is built on Elixir. This difference in language choice affects the syntax, performance, and ecosystem of the frameworks, as well as the overall development experience for developers.
Concurrency Model: Another key difference is the concurrency model used by the frameworks. Flask relies on traditional threading, whereas Phoenix Framework leverages the Erlang VM's lightweight processes, also known as "actors". This difference allows Phoenix Framework to handle high levels of concurrency and makes it well-suited for building scalable real-time applications.
Scalability: Building upon the previous point, Phoenix Framework is designed to be highly scalable. It can handle a large number of concurrent connections and provides features like load balancing and fault tolerance out of the box. Flask, on the other hand, may require additional tools or configurations to achieve similar levels of scalability.
Community and Ecosystem: Flask has a mature and large community of Python developers, which means there is an extensive ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and resources available for developers. Phoenix Framework, being a newer framework, may not have the same level of community support and ecosystem as Flask. However, it is gaining popularity and has an active community that is growing rapidly.
Learning Curve: Due to its simplicity and the familiarity of Python, Flask has a relatively low learning curve, making it easier for beginners to pick up and start using. Phoenix Framework, being built on Elixir and utilizing functional programming concepts, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are unfamiliar with the language or functional programming paradigms.
Frameworks Philosophy: Flask follows the minimalist philosophy, allowing developers to choose which components and libraries they want to use. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, follows the "convention over configuration" philosophy, emphasizing convention and providing a set of out-of-the-box tools and libraries to accelerate development. This difference in philosophy may appeal to different types of developers and projects.

In Summary, Flask and Phoenix Framework differ in the programming languages they are built on, the concurrency models they use, their scalability, the size of their community and ecosystem, the learning curve for developers, and their philosophies regarding minimalism and convention.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Flask, Phoenix Framework

Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon

Django

Python

Flask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k

Comments

Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.
Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.
Support for swagger/ OpenAPI
Support for JSON Web Token
Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k

Comments

Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Python

Nameko

RabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask	Phoenix Framework
Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.	Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 22.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.0K
Stacks 19.3K	Stacks 1.0K
Followers 16.2K	Followers 1.0K
Votes 60	Votes 678
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 For it flexibility 9 Flexibilty and easy to use 7 User friendly 6 Secured 5 Unopinionated Cons 10 Not JS 7 Context 5 Not fast 1 Don't has many module as in spring	Pros 120 High performance 76 Super fast 70 Rapid development 62 Open source 60 Erlang VM Cons 6 No jobs 5 Very difficult
Integrations
No integrations available	Elixir

What are some alternatives to Flask, Phoenix Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Flask vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

Flask

Flask is a popular Python web framework that allows developers to build web applications quickly and easily.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework is a web framework implemented in Elixir, a functional programming language that runs on the Erlang VM.

Key Differences between Flask and Phoenix Framework

Language: The most obvious difference between Flask and Phoenix Framework is the programming language they are built on. Flask uses Python, while Phoenix Framework is built on Elixir. This difference in language choice affects the syntax, performance, and ecosystem of the frameworks, as well as the overall development experience for developers.
Concurrency Model: Another key difference is the concurrency model used by the frameworks. Flask relies on traditional threading, whereas Phoenix Framework leverages the Erlang VM's lightweight processes, also known as "actors". This difference allows Phoenix Framework to handle high levels of concurrency and makes it well-suited for building scalable real-time applications.
Scalability: Building upon the previous point, Phoenix Framework is designed to be highly scalable. It can handle a large number of concurrent connections and provides features like load balancing and fault tolerance out of the box. Flask, on the other hand, may require additional tools or configurations to achieve similar levels of scalability.
Community and Ecosystem: Flask has a mature and large community of Python developers, which means there is an extensive ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and resources available for developers. Phoenix Framework, being a newer framework, may not have the same level of community support and ecosystem as Flask. However, it is gaining popularity and has an active community that is growing rapidly.
Learning Curve: Due to its simplicity and the familiarity of Python, Flask has a relatively low learning curve, making it easier for beginners to pick up and start using. Phoenix Framework, being built on Elixir and utilizing functional programming concepts, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are unfamiliar with the language or functional programming paradigms.
Frameworks Philosophy: Flask follows the minimalist philosophy, allowing developers to choose which components and libraries they want to use. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, follows the "convention over configuration" philosophy, emphasizing convention and providing a set of out-of-the-box tools and libraries to accelerate development. This difference in philosophy may appeal to different types of developers and projects.