StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Flask vs Phalcon

Flask vs Phalcon

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
Phalcon
Phalcon
Stacks246
Followers294
Votes354
GitHub Stars10.8K
Forks2.0K

Flask vs Phalcon: What are the differences?

## Key Differences Between Flask and Phalcon

1. **Architecture**: Flask follows the WSGI design allowing flexibility and customization in building web applications, while Phalcon utilizes C-extension to improve performance, making it faster compared to Flask in handling requests.
2. **Documentation**: Flask is known for its extensive documentation which makes it easier for beginners to grasp and use its features effectively, whereas Phalcon's documentation might not be as detailed, potentially posing a challenge for new users.
3. **Performance**: Phalcon is generally faster than Flask due to its architecture and use of C-extension, making it a preferred choice for applications with high-performance demands. Flask, on the other hand, is more lightweight and straightforward but may not offer the same level of speed.
4. **Community and Ecosystem**: Flask has a larger community and a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions available, providing a more extensive range of tools and resources for developers. However, Phalcon's community is more niche and may offer less variety in terms of third-party integrations and support.
5. **Learning Curve**: Flask is known for its simplicity and beginner-friendly nature, making it easier for newcomers to learn and start building web applications quickly. In contrast, Phalcon has a steeper learning curve due to its unique architecture and may require more time and effort to master effectively.
6. **Flexibility and Customization**: Flask offers high flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to build applications according to their specific requirements and preferences without any constraints. In contrast, Phalcon provides a more structured approach with predefined components and functionalities, offering less flexibility but promoting faster development in some cases.

In Summary, Flask and Phalcon differ in their architecture, documentation, performance, community, learning curve, and flexibility, catering to different needs and preferences of developers building web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, Phalcon

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments
Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
Phalcon
Phalcon

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
10.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
246
Followers
16.2K
Followers
294
Votes
60
Votes
354
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 65
    Fast
  • 54
    High performance
  • 37
    Open source
  • 35
    Fast and easy to use
  • 32
    Scalable
Cons
  • 4
    Support few databases
  • 2
    Very bad documentation
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Flask, Phalcon?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase