Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Flask vs Gin Gonic: What are the differences?
Introduction: Flask and Gin Gonic are both web frameworks used for building web applications in different programming languages. Flask is a Python web framework, while Gin Gonic is a Go web framework. While both frameworks serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them.
Language: The most significant difference between Flask and Gin Gonic is the programming language they are built in. Flask is built in Python, a high-level, interpreted language, while Gin Gonic is built in Go, a statically typed, compiled language. This language difference affects the syntax, libraries, and ecosystem that can be utilized when developing web applications using these frameworks.
Size and Complexity: Flask is known for its simplicity and minimalistic design, making it a popular choice for beginners or small-scale projects. It has a small codebase and provides the basic functionalities required for web development. On the other hand, Gin Gonic has a larger codebase and offers a more feature-rich set of functionalities, making it suitable for complex and scalable applications.
Performance: Due to the difference in languages and design principles, Gin Gonic generally offers better performance compared to Flask. Go is known for its efficiency and concurrency model, which allows Gin Gonic to handle high traffic and process requests faster. Flask, although not slow, may not perform as well in scenarios requiring high throughput or heavy load.
Routing and Middleware: Flask provides a built-in routing mechanism, allowing developers to define routes and handle HTTP requests easily. However, Gin Gonic offers a more robust and flexible routing system with advanced routing features like route grouping, route parameter validation, and middleware handling. This makes Gin Gonic a preferred choice when complex routing requirements are involved.
Dependency Management: Flask uses pip, the de facto standard package manager for Python, to manage dependencies. Developers can easily install, update, and manage external libraries using pip. On the other hand, Go, the language used by Gin Gonic, has its own package management tool called "go get." Go get allows developers to download and install packages with ease, but it does not offer the same level of dependency management and version control as pip.
Community and Ecosystem: Flask benefits from a large and active Python community. There are numerous libraries, frameworks, and resources available that integrate well with Flask, enabling developers to leverage existing solutions. Gin Gonic, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller but rapidly growing community. The ecosystem around Gin Gonic may not be as extensive as Flask, but it is expanding with time.
In Summary, Flask and Gin Gonic are both web frameworks, but they differ in the programming language they use, size and complexity, performance, routing and middleware capabilities, dependency management, and community support. Flask is suited for simple projects and beginners, while Gin Gonic is suitable for more complex applications requiring high performance and advanced routing features.
My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.
Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?
If you want to be a Web developer with knowledge in another frontend and NoSql technology, maybe continue with Flask. However, if you want to create very fast solutions to grow up with a new business and merge these with data analysis and other tools, Django is the answer. Basically read more about the service architecture where you feel more comfortable, Microservice or Monolithic, but please will not married with any because they solve issues to different contexts.
Which is the best Python framework for microservices?
We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.
Bottle is much less bloated and fast. Its built-in templating system is one of the fastest as it compiles the templates in bytecode. Also Bottle has no depenencies, preventing dependency bloat.
I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.
I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?
Here are some features I am looking for:
Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.
Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.
Support for swagger/ OpenAPI
Support for JSON Web Token
Support for test case coverage report
Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.
For starters flask provides a beautiful and easy way to create REST APIs. Also its supported by excellent beginner docs as well as a very active community. Another good thing with Flask is its widely available list of plugins which allow you to build as you go. Its also good in performance and can scale to a quite decent level. However, if you are sure your project is going to be fairly big, it would be better to start with Django as it provides a lot of features out of the box and is extremely stable in performance. Both these frameworks have support for Swagger, JWT, Coverage Report although you have to install plugins for them. Deploying both of these are fairly simple and there is huge documentation available. Django has one of the best documentations I have come across. I hope I was able to answer your queries.
Pros of Flask
- Flexibilty14
- For it flexibility10
- Flexibilty and easy to use9
- Flask8
- User friendly7
- Secured6
- Unopinionated5
- Orm3
- Secure2
- Beautiful code1
- Easy to get started1
- Easy to develop and maintain applications1
- Not JS1
- Easy to use1
- Documentation1
- Python1
- Minimal1
- Lightweight1
- Easy to setup and get it going1
- Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.1
- Easy to integrate1
- Speed1
- Get started quickly1
- Customizable1
- Simple to use1
- Powerful1
- Rapid development1
- Open source0
- Well designed0
- Productive0
- Awesome0
- Expressive0
- Love it0
Pros of Gin Gonic
- Hight performance11
- Open source5
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Flask
- Not JS10
- Context7
- Not fast5
- Don't has many module as in spring1
Cons of Gin Gonic
- Low performance2
- No wildcard routing1