StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. FitNesse vs Selenium

FitNesse vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
FitNesse
FitNesse
Stacks32
Followers62
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.1K
Forks712

FitNesse vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Comparison between FitNesse and Selenium

Both FitNesse and Selenium are popular tools for testing web applications. While they share similarities in being open-source and supporting multiple programming languages, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Syntax and Usage: FitNesse is a wiki-based testing tool that uses a specific syntax known as the FitNesse markup language. It allows users to write tests in a more human-readable and business-friendly format, using tables and plain text. On the other hand, Selenium is a framework that requires writing code in programming languages such as Java, Python, or C#. This makes FitNesse a better choice for non-technical users, while Selenium appeals more to developers.

  2. Test Automation Capabilities: FitNesse primarily focuses on acceptance testing and is designed to involve stakeholders in the testing process. It offers features like decision tables, scenario outlines, and data-driven testing. Selenium, on the other hand, is more geared towards functional and regression testing of web applications. It provides a wide range of APIs and libraries for interacting with web elements, handling user actions, and validating system behavior.

  3. Browser Compatibility: FitNesse is browser-agnostic and does not rely on any specific web browser. It can be used to test web applications across different browsers without any additional configuration. Selenium, on the other hand, provides specific drivers for different web browsers, allowing developers to execute tests in the browser of their choice. This gives Selenium an advantage in terms of performing browser-specific testing and ensuring cross-browser compatibility.

  4. Integration with Development Tools: FitNesse integrates well with external tools such as Jenkins and Maven for continuous integration and build automation. It provides features to execute tests as part of the CI/CD pipeline and generate test reports. Selenium also offers integrations with popular development tools and frameworks, allowing developers to seamlessly incorporate test automation into their existing workflows. This makes both FitNesse and Selenium suitable for integration into software development processes.

  5. Community and Support: Selenium has a larger and more active community compared to FitNesse. It has widespread adoption and extensive documentation, making it easier to find resources and support. FitNesse, although actively supported by its community, has a relatively smaller user base. However, FitNesse's simplicity and intuitive nature make it a good choice for teams looking for a lightweight and user-friendly testing tool.

  6. Cross-Platform Compatibility: Selenium is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can be used to test web applications on different platforms seamlessly. FitNesse, on the other hand, requires a Java Runtime Environment (JRE) and can be run on any platform that supports Java. While both FitNesse and Selenium offer cross-platform compatibility, the choice may depend on the specific requirements and technology stack of the project.

In summary, FitNesse offers a simpler syntax and user-friendly interface, making it suitable for non-technical users and acceptance testing. Selenium, on the other hand, provides more powerful automation capabilities and extensive programming language support, making it a go-to choice for developers and functional testing. The choice between FitNesse and Selenium depends on the testing objectives, team composition, level of technical expertise, and specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, FitNesse

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
FitNesse
FitNesse

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

It is an open source project. The code base is not owned by any company. A lot of information is shared by the FitNesse community. It's extremely adaptable and is used in areas ranging from Web/GUI tests to testing electronic components.

-
FitNesse is an easy to use wiki web server;Easy to set up: just download the application (a Java jar file) and start it;Specifications/requirements can be used as test input;The major languages are supported
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
2.1K
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
712
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
32
Followers
12.6K
Followers
62
Votes
527
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Karate DSL
Karate DSL
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Selenium, FitNesse?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana