Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Finagle vs RxJS: What are the differences?
Developers describe Finagle as "An extensible RPC system for the JVM". Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency. On the other hand, RxJS is detailed as "The Reactive Extensions for JavaScript". RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.
Finagle and RxJS belong to "Concurrency Frameworks" category of the tech stack.
Finagle and RxJS are both open source tools. It seems that RxJS with 19.7K GitHub stars and 2.26K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Finagle with 7.16K GitHub stars and 1.27K GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, RxJS has a broader approval, being mentioned in 57 company stacks & 44 developers stacks; compared to Finagle, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.
Pros of Finagle
- Fast4
- HTTP-friendly3
- Open Source3
Pros of RxJS
- Easier async data chaining and combining5
- Steep learning curve, but offers predictable operations3
- Ability to build your own stream2
- Works great with any state management implementation2
- Easier testing2
- Documentation1
- Simplifies state management1
- Observable subjects1
- Great for push based architecture1
- Lot of build-in operators1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Finagle
Cons of RxJS
- Steep learning curve3