StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Finagle vs Play

Finagle vs Play

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Play
Play
Stacks752
Followers609
Votes496
GitHub Stars12.6K
Forks4.1K
Finagle
Finagle
Stacks69
Followers101
Votes10
GitHub Stars8.9K
Forks1.4K

Finagle vs Play: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to building web applications in Scala, both Finagle and Play are popular choices among developers. While they both provide tools for creating scalable and efficient applications, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

  1. Concurrent Programming Model: Finagle is a asynchronous, composable RPC system that is well-suited for building high-concurrency systems, while Play is a web application framework that follows a more traditional MVC pattern, which may not be as efficient for handling large volumes of concurrent requests.

  2. Purpose and Usage: Finagle is primarily used for building distributed systems and asynchronous services, making it a great choice for microservices architecture, while Play is a full-fledged web framework that includes features like form handling, templating engines, and routing, ideal for building web applications.

  3. Community and Support: Play has a larger community and more resources available due to its popularity as a web development framework, making it easier to find help and resources when working with Play compared to Finagle.

  4. Performance: Finagle is known for its high-performance networking capabilities, making it a suitable choice for building applications that require low latency and high throughput, whereas Play, being more feature-rich, may not have the same level of performance in terms of handling high loads.

  5. Flexibility and Extensibility: Finagle allows for more flexibility in terms of building custom protocols and services due to its composable nature, while Play, being more opinionated in its approach, may not provide the same level of flexibility for building custom solutions.

  6. Learning Curve: Due to its focus on being a full-stack framework, Play may have a steeper learning curve for beginners compared to Finagle, which is more focused on specific networking and distributed systems concepts, making it easier to grasp for those with a background in these areas.

In Summary, Finagle and Play offer different strengths and are tailored for different use cases, with Finagle being more suited for building distributed systems and high-concurrency services, while Play excels in web application development with a full-fledged MVC framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Play
Play
Finagle
Finagle

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.6K
GitHub Stars
8.9K
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
752
Stacks
69
Followers
609
Followers
101
Votes
496
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 81
    Scala
  • 55
    Web-friendly architecture
  • 55
    Built on akka
  • 50
    Stateless
  • 47
    High-scalable
Cons
  • 3
    Evolves fast, keep up with releases
  • 1
    Unnecessarily complicated
Pros
  • 4
    Fast
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 3
    HTTP-friendly

What are some alternatives to Play, Finagle?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase