StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Fat-Free vs PHP-MVC

Fat-Free vs PHP-MVC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Fat-Free
Fat-Free
Stacks39
Followers51
Votes41
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks443
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3

Fat-Free vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Fat-Free and PHP-MVC are two popular PHP frameworks used for web development. While they both follow the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. **Routing System**: Fat-Free uses a routing system based on regular expressions, allowing for more flexibility in defining routes compared to PHP-MVC, which follows a more traditional route mapping approach.
   
2. **Built-in Features**: Fat-Free provides out-of-the-box features such as Caching, Encryption, and Error handling, while in PHP-MVC, these functionalities need to be implemented manually or through additional libraries.

3. **Performance**: Fat-Free is known for its lightweight nature and high performance due to its minimalistic design, making it suitable for smaller projects or microservices. In contrast, PHP-MVC can be more resource-intensive, especially for larger applications.

4. **Configuration**: Fat-Free uses a simple configuration file where settings can be easily defined, while PHP-MVC may require more complex configuration setups depending on the project requirements.

5. **Template Engine**: PHP-MVC often relies on third-party template engines like Twig or Smarty for rendering views, while Fat-Free has its own built-in template engine, making it simpler to manage the presentation layer.

6. **Community and Support**: PHP-MVC has a larger community and more extensive documentation compared to Fat-Free, making it easier to find help and resources when working on projects using this framework.

In Summary, Fat-Free and PHP-MVC differ in their routing system, built-in features, performance, configuration, template engine, and community support. Each framework has its strengths and weaknesses, catering to different project requirements and developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fat-Free
Fat-Free
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC

Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs.

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
443
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
39
Stacks
106
Followers
51
Followers
222
Votes
41
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Open source
  • 7
    Fast
  • 5
    Neat and Clean
  • 5
    Design pattern flexibility
  • 4
    SQL AND NOSQL ORM
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Integrations
PHP
PHP
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Fat-Free, PHP-MVC?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase