F5 BIG-IP vs Seesaw: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Deployment Environment: F5 BIG-IP is typically deployed as a hardware appliance, while Seesaw is commonly deployed as software running on commodity hardware or virtual machines.

2. Licensing Model: F5 BIG-IP utilizes a traditional license-based model, where customers pay for specific features and capacities. On the other hand, Seesaw follows an open-source model, providing free access to its software with the option of purchasing support services.

3. Feature Set: F5 BIG-IP offers a wide range of enterprise-grade features such as L4-L7 load balancing, application security, and SSL offloading. Seesaw, on the other hand, focuses primarily on load balancing functionalities, making it a lightweight alternative for specific use cases.

4. Community Support: F5 BIG-IP benefits from the extensive support provided by the vendor, including documentation, training, and professional services. Seesaw, being an open-source project, relies heavily on community support through forums, user groups, and contributions from developers around the world.

5. Customization and Flexibility: F5 BIG-IP provides a highly customizable platform with various configuration options to meet complex networking requirements. Seesaw, while offering flexibility, is more streamlined and may not offer the same level of customization as F5 BIG-IP.

6. Scalability and Performance: F5 BIG-IP is known for its scalability and performance in handling high traffic volumes and complex application requirements. Seesaw, although capable of scaling, may have limitations compared to F5 BIG-IP in terms of handling extensive workloads efficiently.

In Summary, F5 BIG-IP and Seesaw differ in deployment models, licensing, feature sets, support, customization, and scalability, making them suitable for specific use cases based on organizational requirements.