StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. ExpressJS vs Next.js

ExpressJS vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

ExpressJS vs Next.js: What are the differences?

ExpressJS and Next.js are popular frameworks for building web applications, but they have distinct differences in their approach and functionality. Let's explore the key differences between them:

  1. Architecture: ExpressJS is a minimalistic framework. It follows a middleware-based architecture, allowing developers to add custom functionality at each step of the request-response cycle. Next.js, on the other hand, is a higher-level framework built on top of React. It provides a more opinionated architecture with built-in support for server-side rendering, automatic routing, and other advanced features.

  2. Server-side Rendering: ExpressJS primarily focuses on client-side rendering, where the server sends static HTML files to the client, and the client-side JavaScript takes over to handle interactivity. Next.js, on the other hand, excels at server-side rendering (SSR) and offers built-in support for it. SSR enables faster initial page load times, improved SEO, and better user experience.

  3. Routing: ExpressJS offers manual route handling, where developers define routes and associated middleware manually. It provides flexibility but requires explicit route definitions. In contrast, Next.js offers automatic routing based on file structure. Developers can create pages by simply creating corresponding files in the pages directory, and Next.js handles the routing automatically.

  4. Data Fetching: ExpressJS does not provide specific tools or conventions for data fetching. Developers have the freedom to choose their preferred data fetching libraries or approaches. Next.js, however, offers built-in support for data fetching through. These functions allow developers to fetch data during the server-side rendering process and pass it as props to the corresponding components.

  5. Ecosystem and Community: ExpressJS has a mature and extensive ecosystem with a wide range of middleware and libraries available. It has been around for a long time and has a large and active community that contributes to its development and provides support. Next.js, while relatively newer, has gained significant popularity and has a growing ecosystem. It benefits from the robust React ecosystem and community support.

In summary, ExpressJS is a lightweight and flexible framework suitable for building custom APIs and microservices, while Next.js is a higher-level framework that excels at server-side rendering, automatic routing, and data fetching.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ExpressJS, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Next.js
Next.js

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
24.0K
Followers
5.1K
Votes
1.6K
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
React
React

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase