StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Experitest vs Sauce Labs

Experitest vs Sauce Labs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Stacks314
Followers435
Votes439
Experitest
Experitest
Stacks8
Followers37
Votes0

Experitest vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

  1. Price: One key difference between Experitest and Sauce Labs is their pricing. Experitest offers flexible pricing plans, including both monthly and annual subscriptions, catering to various budgets and needs. On the other hand, Sauce Labs offers a range of pricing options based on the number of parallel tests and minutes utilized, making it suitable for different testing requirements.

  2. Supported Platforms: Experitest specializes in supporting a wide range of platforms, including mobile (iOS, Android), web, desktop, and hybrid applications. In contrast, Sauce Labs focuses primarily on web and mobile platforms, with an emphasis on automating real mobile devices and browsers for testing purposes.

  3. Test Automation Frameworks: Experitest provides built-in support for popular test automation frameworks like Selenium and Appium, enabling users to easily integrate their existing test scripts. In contrast, Sauce Labs offers extensive support for various test automation frameworks, including Selenium, Appium, and Espresso, broadening the options for users looking to integrate their preferred frameworks.

  4. Device and Browser Coverage: Experitest boasts a vast device and browser cloud with extensive coverage, encompassing over 2000 real devices, browsers, and operating systems. Sauce Labs, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive device and browser cloud, covering a wide range of popular devices, browsers, and operating systems but with a slightly smaller overall selection.

  5. Testing Environments: Experitest provides the capability to create and manage private cloud testing environments, allowing users to have dedicated resources for their testing needs. In contrast, Sauce Labs primarily offers a shared cloud environment with shared resources among users, which might not be suitable for organizations requiring exclusive testing environments.

  6. Reporting and Analytics: Experitest offers comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities, providing users with detailed insights into test execution, results, and performance metrics. Sauce Labs also provides reporting and analytics features, allowing users to monitor and analyze test results and performance, but with a slightly different set of reporting options.

In Summary, Experitest and Sauce Labs differ in their pricing models, supported platforms, test automation framework support, device and browser coverage, testing environments, and reporting and analytics capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sauce Labs, Experitest

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Experitest
Experitest

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

It allows users to create and run Appium, Selenium, XCUITest & Espresso tests against real devices and web browsers. Users can create & execute hundreds of manual or automated tests in parallel on IOS & Android devices. Users can automate their cross-browser testing, perform visual testing and access advanced analytics.

700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs
Live mobile app testing; Automated mobile app testing; Live cross-browser testing; Automated cross-browser testing; Visual testing; Global data centers; Test development; Open source compatibility; Large scale test execution; Integrations with CI tools; Integrations with development and testing tools
Statistics
Stacks
314
Stacks
8
Followers
435
Followers
37
Votes
439
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 2
    Relatively slow
No community feedback yet
Integrations
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Appium
Appium
Jenkins
Jenkins
Selenium
Selenium
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
TeamCity
TeamCity
Applitools
Applitools
Bamboo
Bamboo
Bamboo
Bamboo
Java
Java
C#
C#
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
TestNG
TestNG
Ruby
Ruby
Eclipse
Eclipse
Selenium
Selenium

What are some alternatives to Sauce Labs, Experitest?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana