ES6 vs Handlebars.js

Overview

Handlebars.js

Stacks8.3K

Followers3.2K

Votes308

ES6

Stacks72.5K

Followers60.9K

Votes167

ES6 vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ES6 and Handlebars.js

ES6 and Handlebars.js are two different technologies used for web development with JavaScript. While both have their strengths and use cases, there are several key differences between them:

Syntax: ES6 is a standardized version of JavaScript that introduces new syntax and features to the language. It provides enhanced capabilities such as arrow functions, template literals, and destructuring. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is a templating engine that allows for dynamic templating using pre-defined templates and placeholders.
Data Binding: ES6 provides built-in data binding capabilities through the use of frameworks like React or Angular. With ES6, data changes can be automatically reflected in the HTML. On the other hand, Handlebars.js provides data binding through its template system, where data can be injected into predefined templates to generate dynamic content.
Template Structure: ES6 does not have a specific template structure, as it mainly focuses on providing advanced JavaScript syntax and features. On the contrary, Handlebars.js uses a specific template structure with placeholders and specific syntax for injecting dynamic data into the templates.
Browser Compatibility: ES6 features are supported in most modern browsers. However, there might be some discrepancies in terms of support for certain features across different browsers. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is a library that can be used to generate HTML on the client-side without relying on ES6 features, making it compatible with a wider range of browsers.
Flexibility and Extensibility: ES6 provides more flexibility and extensibility compared to Handlebars.js. With ES6, developers can take advantage of a wide range of language features and libraries, allowing for greater customization and flexibility in web development. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, provides a more structured approach to templating and may not offer the same level of flexibility.
Learning Curve: Learning ES6 requires understanding new syntax and language features, which may take some time for developers who are not familiar with it. On the other hand, Handlebars.js has its own syntax and template structure, which can be easily learned and adopted once the basics are understood.

In summary, ES6 is a standardized version of JavaScript that provides new language features and syntax, while Handlebars.js is a templating engine that focuses on generating dynamic HTML using predefined templates. ES6 offers more flexibility and extensibility, while Handlebars.js provides a more structured approach to templating.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Handlebars.js, ES6

Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET

Handlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k

Comments

Amir

Feb 7, 2020

Review

This post is a bit of an obvious one, as we have a web application, we obviously need to have HTML and CSS in our stack. Though specifically though, we can talk a bit about backward compatibility and the specific approaches we want to enforce in our codebase.

HTML : Not much explanation here, you have to interact with HTML for a web app. We will stick to the latest standard: HTML 5.

CSS: Again if we want to style any of our components within he web, we have to use to style it. Though we will be taking advantage of JSS in our code base and try to minimize the # of CSS stylesheets and include all our styling within the components themselves. This leaves the codebase much cleaner and makes it easier to find styles!

Babel: We understand that not every browser is able to support the cool new features of the latest node/JS features (such as redue, filter, etc) seen in ES6. We will make sure to have the correct Babel configuration o make our application backward compatible.

Material UI (MUI): We need to make our user interface as intuitive and pretty as possible within his MVP, and the UI framework used by Google will provide us with exactly that. MUI provides pretty much all the UI components you would need and allows heavy customization as well. Its vast # of demos will allow us to add components quickly and not get too hung up on making UI components.

We will be using the latest version of create-react-app which bundles most of the above along many necessary frameworks (e.g. Jest for testing) to get started quickly.

128k views128k

Comments

Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Review

How to make your JS code faster just adding some parenthesis?

Optimize-js I will not describe this tool a lot here, because it's already good done by author on github

I just want to mention that this tool wrap up all immediately-invoked functions or likely-to-be-invoked functions in parentheses what is do a great optimization a JavaScript file for faster initial execution and parsing (based on my experience).

The performance of application where I've introduced optimize-js improved on 20% in a common (tested in Chrome and IE11).

Why it happens?

Clarification on Readme to the optimize-js
Some of Nolan thoughts on the virtues of compile-time optimizations can be found in "Parens and Performance" – counterpost

Is it maintaining now? - Unfortunately, no (but feel free to send PR)

223k views223k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js	ES6
Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.	Goals for ECMAScript 2015 include providing better support for large applications, library creation, and for use of ECMAScript as a compilation target for other languages. Some of its major enhancements include modules, class declarations, lexical block scoping, iterators and generators, promises for asynchronous programming, destructuring patterns, and proper tail calls.
Statistics
Stacks 8.3K	Stacks 72.5K
Followers 3.2K	Followers 60.9K
Votes 308	Votes 167
Pros & Cons
Pros 106 Simple 76 Great templating language 50 Open source 36 Logicless 20 Integrates well into any codebase	Pros 109 ES6 code is shorter than traditional JS 52 Module System Standardized 2 Extremly compact 2 Destructuring Assignment 1 The database is recommended to use MySQL Cons 1 Suffers from baggage 1 Create Node.js
Integrations
Mustache	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, ES6?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

ES6 vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ES6 and Handlebars.js

ES6 and Handlebars.js are two different technologies used for web development with JavaScript. While both have their strengths and use cases, there are several key differences between them:

Syntax: ES6 is a standardized version of JavaScript that introduces new syntax and features to the language. It provides enhanced capabilities such as arrow functions, template literals, and destructuring. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is a templating engine that allows for dynamic templating using pre-defined templates and placeholders.
Data Binding: ES6 provides built-in data binding capabilities through the use of frameworks like React or Angular. With ES6, data changes can be automatically reflected in the HTML. On the other hand, Handlebars.js provides data binding through its template system, where data can be injected into predefined templates to generate dynamic content.
Template Structure: ES6 does not have a specific template structure, as it mainly focuses on providing advanced JavaScript syntax and features. On the contrary, Handlebars.js uses a specific template structure with placeholders and specific syntax for injecting dynamic data into the templates.
Browser Compatibility: ES6 features are supported in most modern browsers. However, there might be some discrepancies in terms of support for certain features across different browsers. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is a library that can be used to generate HTML on the client-side without relying on ES6 features, making it compatible with a wider range of browsers.
Flexibility and Extensibility: ES6 provides more flexibility and extensibility compared to Handlebars.js. With ES6, developers can take advantage of a wide range of language features and libraries, allowing for greater customization and flexibility in web development. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, provides a more structured approach to templating and may not offer the same level of flexibility.
Learning Curve: Learning ES6 requires understanding new syntax and language features, which may take some time for developers who are not familiar with it. On the other hand, Handlebars.js has its own syntax and template structure, which can be easily learned and adopted once the basics are understood.

ES6 vs Handlebars.js

Overview

ES6 vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?