Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Emacs vs Gerrit Code Review: What are the differences?
Introduction: This Markdown code outlines the key differences between Emacs and Gerrit Code Review, highlighting specific aspects that set these two tools apart in the development landscape.
1. Customization and Extensibility: Emacs is highly customizable and extensible through the use of Emacs Lisp, allowing users to tailor the editor to their specific needs by adding new functionalities or modifying existing ones. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review is focused on code review processes and lacks the extensive customization capabilities of Emacs.
2. User Interface: Emacs has a powerful but steep learning curve with its command-driven interface that requires memorizing numerous key bindings for efficient usage. On the other hand, Gerrit Code Review provides a more intuitive web-based interface that simplifies the code review process for users, particularly those who are not well-versed in Emacs commands.
3. Collaboration Features: Gerrit Code Review is specifically designed for collaborative development, offering features like reviewing changesets, commenting on code, and tracking the progress of code reviews. While Emacs also supports collaboration through plugins and integrations, it is primarily an individual productivity tool rather than a dedicated platform for team code reviews.
4. Version Control Integration: Gerrit Code Review integrates seamlessly with Git, providing a tight coupling between the code review process and version control system. Emacs, on the other hand, can be configured to work with various version control systems, but the level of integration may not be as deep as that offered by Gerrit for Git.
5. Workflow Automation: Gerrit Code Review streamlines the code review workflow by automating tasks such as assigning reviewers, setting up approval criteria, and triggering notifications based on predefined rules. In contrast, Emacs relies on the user's manual intervention and customization to manage workflows, lacking the built-in automation capabilities of Gerrit Code Review.
6. Code Review Focus: While Emacs is a versatile text editor with a wide range of features beyond code editing, Gerrit Code Review is purpose-built for code review processes, offering specialized tools and functionalities tailored specifically for reviewing and improving code quality.
In Summary, the key differences between Emacs and Gerrit Code Review lie in customization and extensibility, user interface, collaboration features, version control integration, workflow automation, and code review focus, highlighting varying strengths and focuses in the development tools landscape.
Pros of Emacs
- Vast array of extensions65
- Have all you can imagine44
- Everything i need in one place40
- Portability39
- Customer config32
- Your config works on any platform16
- Low memory consumption13
- Perfect for monsters11
- All life inside one program10
- Extendable, portable, fast - all at your fingertips8
- Enables extremely rapid keyboard-only navigation6
- Widely-used keybindings (e.g. by bash)5
- Extensible in Lisp5
- Runs everywhere important5
- FOSS Software4
- Powerful multilanguage IDE4
- Git integration4
- May be old but always reliable4
- Asynchronous3
- Powerful UI3
- Huge ecosystem1
Pros of Gerrit Code Review
- Code review13
- Good workflow11
- Cleaner repository story10
- Open source9
- Good integration with Jenkins9
- Unlimited repo support5
- Comparison dashboard2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Emacs
- So good and extensible, that one can get sidetracked4
- Hard to learn for beginners4
- Not default preinstalled in GNU/linux1