Elm vs Sass

Overview

Sass

Stacks44.8K

Followers32.2K

Votes3.0K

GitHub Stars15.3K

Forks2.2K

Elm

Stacks758

Followers744

Votes319

Elm vs Sass: What are the differences?

Syntax and Language Paradigm: Elm is a functional programming language, whereas Sass is a style sheet language that is an extension of CSS. Elm follows a purely functional paradigm, while Sass is more focused on enhancing CSS features and functionality.
Type Safety: Elm is known for its strong type system that enforces type safety at compile time, eliminating runtime errors related to types. In contrast, Sass does not have the concept of type safety as it primarily focuses on providing additional features and syntactic sugar for CSS developers.
Compilation: Elm code is compiled to JavaScript, which enables it to run in the browser. On the other hand, Sass is compiled to CSS, allowing developers to write maintainable and scalable stylesheets but does not have the ability to compiled to another language like Elm.
Error Handling: Elm provides detailed and helpful error messages, aiding developers in identifying and fixing issues quickly. Sass, on the other hand, may provide limited error handling capabilities, making it more challenging to pinpoint and resolve errors efficiently.
Tooling and Ecosystem: Elm comes with a robust compiler and package manager, Elm Package, that helps manage dependencies efficiently. In comparison, Sass has a variety of build tools and integrations available, but may not have a standardized ecosystem like Elm.
Community Support: Elm has a smaller but dedicated community that emphasizes simplicity, correctness, and productivity. Sass, however, has a larger community due to its widespread use in web development for extending CSS features and providing style maintenance capabilities.

In Summary, Elm and Sass differ in their language paradigm, type safety, compilation target, error handling, tooling ecosystem, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sass, Elm

Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Sass

Stylus

PostCSS

Originally, I was going to start using @{Sass}|tool:1171| with Parcel, but then I learned about @{Stylus}|tool:1172|, which looked interesting because it can get the property values of something directly instead of through variables, and @{PostCSS}|tool:3339|, which looked interesting because you can customize your Pre/Post-processing. Which tool would you recommend?

547k views547k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sass	Elm
Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.	Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.
-	No Runtime Exceptions; Fearless refactoring; Understand anyone's code; Fast and friendly feedback; Enforced Semantic Versioning; Small Assets
Statistics
GitHub Stars 15.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 44.8K	Stacks 758
Followers 32.2K	Followers 744
Votes 3.0K	Votes 319
Pros & Cons
Pros 613 Variables 594 Mixins 466 Nested rules 410 Maintainable 300 Functions Cons 6 Needs to be compiled	Pros 45 Code stays clean 44 Great type system 40 No Runtime Exceptions 33 Fun 28 Easy to understand Cons 3 No typeclasses -> repitition (i.e. map has 130versions) 2 JS interoperability a bit more involved 2 JS interop can not be async 1 No JSX/Template 1 No communication with users

What are some alternatives to Sass, Elm?

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Stylus

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PostCSS

PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.

Bourbon

Bourbon is a library of pure sass mixins that are designed to be simple and easy to use. No configuration required. The mixins aim to be as vanilla as possible, meaning they should be as close to the original CSS syntax as possible.

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

Related Comparisons

Elm vs Sass: What are the differences?

Syntax and Language Paradigm: Elm is a functional programming language, whereas Sass is a style sheet language that is an extension of CSS. Elm follows a purely functional paradigm, while Sass is more focused on enhancing CSS features and functionality.
Type Safety: Elm is known for its strong type system that enforces type safety at compile time, eliminating runtime errors related to types. In contrast, Sass does not have the concept of type safety as it primarily focuses on providing additional features and syntactic sugar for CSS developers.
Compilation: Elm code is compiled to JavaScript, which enables it to run in the browser. On the other hand, Sass is compiled to CSS, allowing developers to write maintainable and scalable stylesheets but does not have the ability to compiled to another language like Elm.
Error Handling: Elm provides detailed and helpful error messages, aiding developers in identifying and fixing issues quickly. Sass, on the other hand, may provide limited error handling capabilities, making it more challenging to pinpoint and resolve errors efficiently.
Tooling and Ecosystem: Elm comes with a robust compiler and package manager, Elm Package, that helps manage dependencies efficiently. In comparison, Sass has a variety of build tools and integrations available, but may not have a standardized ecosystem like Elm.
Community Support: Elm has a smaller but dedicated community that emphasizes simplicity, correctness, and productivity. Sass, however, has a larger community due to its widespread use in web development for extending CSS features and providing style maintenance capabilities.

In Summary, Elm and Sass differ in their language paradigm, type safety, compilation target, error handling, tooling ecosystem, and community support.

Elm vs Sass

Overview