Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Elm

745
744
+ 1
319
Sass

42.4K
31.5K
+ 1
3K
Add tool

Elm vs Sass: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax and Language Paradigm: Elm is a functional programming language, whereas Sass is a style sheet language that is an extension of CSS. Elm follows a purely functional paradigm, while Sass is more focused on enhancing CSS features and functionality.

  2. Type Safety: Elm is known for its strong type system that enforces type safety at compile time, eliminating runtime errors related to types. In contrast, Sass does not have the concept of type safety as it primarily focuses on providing additional features and syntactic sugar for CSS developers.

  3. Compilation: Elm code is compiled to JavaScript, which enables it to run in the browser. On the other hand, Sass is compiled to CSS, allowing developers to write maintainable and scalable stylesheets but does not have the ability to compiled to another language like Elm.

  4. Error Handling: Elm provides detailed and helpful error messages, aiding developers in identifying and fixing issues quickly. Sass, on the other hand, may provide limited error handling capabilities, making it more challenging to pinpoint and resolve errors efficiently.

  5. Tooling and Ecosystem: Elm comes with a robust compiler and package manager, Elm Package, that helps manage dependencies efficiently. In comparison, Sass has a variety of build tools and integrations available, but may not have a standardized ecosystem like Elm.

  6. Community Support: Elm has a smaller but dedicated community that emphasizes simplicity, correctness, and productivity. Sass, however, has a larger community due to its widespread use in web development for extending CSS features and providing style maintenance capabilities.

In Summary, Elm and Sass differ in their language paradigm, type safety, compilation target, error handling, tooling ecosystem, and community support.

Advice on Elm and Sass
awesomebanana2018
Needs advice
on
PostCSSPostCSSSassSass
and
StylusStylus

Originally, I was going to start using Sass with Parcel, but then I learned about Stylus, which looked interesting because it can get the property values of something directly instead of through variables, and PostCSS, which looked interesting because you can customize your Pre/Post-processing. Which tool would you recommend?

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends
on
PostCSSPostCSS

You're not correct with saying "vs Postcss". You're using Less/Sass/Stylus/... to produce "CSS" (maybe extended means it has some future features) and then in any case PostCSS will play (it is shipped with Parcel/NextJS/CRA/...)

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Elm
Pros of Sass
  • 45
    Code stays clean
  • 44
    Great type system
  • 40
    No Runtime Exceptions
  • 33
    Fun
  • 28
    Easy to understand
  • 23
    Type safety
  • 22
    Correctness
  • 17
    JS fatigue
  • 12
    Ecosystem agrees on one Application Architecture
  • 12
    Declarative
  • 10
    Friendly compiler messages
  • 8
    Fast rendering
  • 7
    If it compiles, it runs
  • 7
    Welcoming community
  • 5
    Stable ecosystem
  • 4
    'Batteries included'
  • 2
    Package.elm-lang.org
  • 613
    Variables
  • 594
    Mixins
  • 466
    Nested rules
  • 410
    Maintainable
  • 300
    Functions
  • 149
    Modular flexible code
  • 143
    Open source
  • 112
    Selector inheritance
  • 107
    Dynamic
  • 96
    Better than cs
  • 5
    Used by Bootstrap
  • 3
    If and for function
  • 2
    Better than less
  • 1
    Inheritance (@extend)
  • 1
    Custom functions

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Elm
Cons of Sass
  • 3
    No typeclasses -> repitition (i.e. map has 130versions)
  • 2
    JS interop can not be async
  • 2
    JS interoperability a bit more involved
  • 1
    More code is required
  • 1
    No JSX/Template
  • 1
    Main developer enforces "the correct" style hard
  • 1
    No communication with users
  • 1
    Backwards compability breaks between releases
  • 6
    Needs to be compiled

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Elm?

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

What is Sass?

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Elm?
What companies use Sass?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Elm?
What tools integrate with Sass?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Elm and Sass?
TypeScript
TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
React
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
PureScript
A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.
ReasonML
It lets you write simple, fast and quality type safe code while leveraging both the JavaScript & OCaml ecosystems.It is powerful, safe type inference means you rarely have to annotate types, but everything gets checked for you.
Haskell
It is a general purpose language that can be used in any domain and use case, it is ideally suited for proprietary business logic and data analysis, fast prototyping and enhancing existing software environments with correct code, performance and scalability.
See all alternatives