Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ELK vs LogDNA: What are the differences?
Introduction
ELK (Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana) and LogDNA are both popular log management solutions used for analyzing and visualizing logs. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms that set them apart in terms of features and capabilities.
Scalability and Flexibility: ELK offers a highly scalable and flexible log management solution. It can handle large volumes of logs and scale horizontally as per the needs of the organization. On the other hand, LogDNA provides a cloud-native log management platform that offers simplicity and ease of use but may not be as scalable or flexible as ELK.
Ease of Deployment and Management: ELK requires manual setup and configuration, making it more complex to deploy and manage. On the other hand, LogDNA streamlines the deployment process by offering a fully managed log management platform. It simplifies log collection and management, enabling users to get started quickly without the need for extensive setup and configuration.
Search and Query Capabilities: ELK provides robust search and query capabilities with Elasticsearch at its core. Elasticsearch offers advanced search functionality, including full-text search and support for complex queries. LogDNA, on the other hand, offers a simpler and more intuitive search interface, which may be suitable for users who require basic search and query functionality.
Alerting and Notification: ELK offers flexible alerting and notification capabilities through its Watcher feature. It allows users to define thresholds and conditions for triggering alerts based on log events. LogDNA also provides alerting functionality, allowing users to set up alerts based on specific log patterns or events.
Integration and Plugin Ecosystem: ELK has a wide range of integrations and plugins available, allowing users to extend its functionality and integrate with other systems or tools. LogDNA, while offering some integrations, may have a more limited plugin ecosystem compared to ELK.
Pricing Model: ELK follows an open-source model with a range of pricing options based on support and additional features. LogDNA, on the other hand, offers a subscription-based pricing model that includes different tiers based on log volume and retention needs.
In summary, ELK provides a highly scalable and flexible log management solution with advanced search capabilities and extensive integrations, while LogDNA offers simplified deployment and management, intuitive search functionality, and a fully managed log management platform. Your choice between the two will depend on your specific log management requirements and preferences.
Pros of ELK
- Open source14
- Can run locally4
- Good for startups with monetary limitations3
- External Network Goes Down You Aren't Without Logging1
- Easy to setup1
- Json log supprt0
- Live logging0
Pros of LogDNA
- Easy setup6
- Cheap4
- Extremely fast3
- Powerful filtering and alerting functionality2
- Graphing capabilities1
- Export data to S31
- Multi-cloud1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ELK
- Elastic Search is a resource hog5
- Logstash configuration is a pain3
- Bad for startups with personal limitations1
Cons of LogDNA
- Limited visualization capabilities1
- Cannot copy & paste text from visualization1