StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. EJS vs Hogan.js

EJS vs Hogan.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hogan.js
Hogan.js
Stacks358
Followers56
Votes3
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks431
EJS
EJS
Stacks522
Followers359
Votes18
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks859

EJS vs Hogan.js: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will highlight key differences between EJS and Hogan.js.

1. **Syntax Differences**: EJS uses `<% %>` and `<%= %>` tags for control flow and output, while Hogan.js uses `{{ }}` and `{{{ }}}` for the same purposes.
2. **Performance**: EJS is said to be faster than Hogan.js in terms of template rendering, making it a preferred choice for projects where speed is essential.
3. **Flexibility**: EJS allows the use of JavaScript code within the template, providing more flexibility in terms of logic and data manipulation compared to Hogan.js, which has a more limited feature set.
4. **Maintenance**: Hogan.js is no longer actively maintained, while EJS is still being actively developed and updated, ensuring better support and compatibility with modern web technologies.
5. **Community Support**: EJS has a larger community of users and contributors, which means more resources, tutorials, and support available for developers using EJS compared to Hogan.js.
6. **Filtering and Escaping**: Hogan.js has built-in support for automatic HTML escaping, while EJS requires manual escaping of output to prevent cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

In Summary, EJS and Hogan.js differ in syntax, performance, flexibility, maintenance, community support, and filtering/escaping mechanisms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hogan.js
Hogan.js
EJS
EJS

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

-
Template caching and partials;Intelligent error handling with line numbers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
431
GitHub Forks
859
Stacks
358
Stacks
522
Followers
56
Followers
359
Votes
3
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Lightweight
Pros
  • 6
    For a beginner it's just plain javascript code
  • 6
    It'a easy to understand the concept behind it
  • 3
    Quick for templating UI project
  • 3
    You almost know how to use it from start
Integrations
Mustache
Mustache
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Hogan.js, EJS?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Nunjucks

Nunjucks

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Jsonnet

Jsonnet

It is a data templating language for app and tool developers. It is a powerful DSL for elegant description of JSON data.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase