StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Editor.js vs react-three-fiber

Editor.js vs react-three-fiber

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Editor.js
Editor.js
Stacks15
Followers17
Votes0
GitHub Stars31.1K
Forks2.2K
react-three-fiber
react-three-fiber
Stacks52
Followers46
Votes0

Editor.js vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code snippet, we will outline the key differences between Editor.js and react-three-fiber.

  1. Rendering Capabilities: Editor.js is primarily used for creating rich text editors and custom content structures, while react-three-fiber is focused on rendering 3D graphics using the Three.js library in a React environment.

  2. Use Case: Editor.js is suited for projects that require text editing and content structuring, such as blog platforms or document editors. On the other hand, react-three-fiber is ideal for applications that involve complex 3D visualizations or virtual reality experiences.

  3. Component Composition: Editor.js facilitates easy integration of various rich text components like headings, paragraphs, lists, etc., making it simple to build structured content. In contrast, react-three-fiber deals with composing 3D objects and scenes using a declarative approach in React.

  4. Interactivity: With Editor.js, users can interact with the content through text editing features like formatting, inserting media, and drag-and-drop elements. In react-three-fiber, interactivity involves user interactions with 3D objects in the scene through events and controls.

  5. Community Support: Editor.js has an active community that regularly contributes new plugins, extensions, and updates to enhance its functionality. However, react-three-fiber benefits from the extensive support and resources available for the Three.js library, enabling developers to leverage a wealth of 3D rendering capabilities.

  6. Performance Considerations: While Editor.js focuses on providing a user-friendly text editing experience, react-three-fiber requires efficient optimizations to handle the rendering of complex 3D scenes and animations, ensuring smooth performance in demanding applications.

In Summary, the key differences between Editor.js and react-three-fiber lie in their primary functions, use cases, component composition, interactivity features, community support, and performance considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Editor.js
Editor.js
react-three-fiber
react-three-fiber

It is a block-styled editor for rich media stories. It outputs clean data in JSON instead of heavy HTML-markup. And more important thing is that Editor.js is designed to be API extendable and pluggable.

It is a React renderer for Threejs on the web and react-native. Rendering performance is up to Threejs and the GPU. Components participate in the renderloop outside of React, without any additional overhead.

Clean data output; API pluggable; Open source
React renderer for Three.js; Web and react-native
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
15
Stacks
52
Followers
17
Followers
46
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
three.js
three.js

What are some alternatives to Editor.js, react-three-fiber?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Unity

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Godot

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Unreal Engine

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Panda3D

Panda3D

It is a game engine that includes graphics, audio, I/O, collision detection, and other abilities relevant to the creation of 3D games.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase