StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Eclipse Che vs GitLab

Eclipse Che vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Eclipse Che
Eclipse Che
Stacks58
Followers148
Votes28

Eclipse Che vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will analyze the key differences between Eclipse Che and GitLab.

  1. Deployment Environment: Eclipse Che provides a cloud IDE that runs on Kubernetes, allowing developers to collaborate and build applications in a containerized environment. GitLab, on the other hand, is a DevOps platform that includes source code management, CI/CD, and collaboration tools but does not offer a built-in IDE or containerized development environment.

  2. License: Eclipse Che is open-source and available under the Eclipse Public License, allowing users to modify and distribute the software freely. In contrast, GitLab offers a mix of open-source and commercial editions, with more advanced features and support available for paying customers.

  3. Focus: Eclipse Che focuses on providing a cloud-based IDE for developers to build, test, and deploy applications in a collaborative environment. GitLab, on the other hand, is a complete DevOps platform that encompasses the entire software development lifecycle, including version control, issue tracking, CI/CD, security scanning, and more.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Eclipse Che has a vibrant community of developers and contributors who actively work on improving the platform and adding new features. GitLab also has a strong community but is more known for its enterprise customers and support services.

  5. Integration: Eclipse Che integrates with various tools and services, such as Docker, Kubernetes, and Git, to provide a seamless development experience. GitLab also offers integration with popular tools and services, but its focus is more on providing an all-in-one platform for DevOps.

  6. Scalability: Eclipse Che is designed to be highly scalable, allowing developers to create and manage workspaces with ease. GitLab can also scale to meet the needs of large organizations, providing features like high availability, geo-replication, and flexible deployment options.

In Summary, the key differences between Eclipse Che and GitLab lie in their deployment environment, license, focus, community, integration, and scalability capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Eclipse Che

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Eclipse Che
Eclipse Che

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Eclipse Che makes Kubernetes development accessible for developer teams, providing one-click developer workspaces and eliminating local environment configuration for your entire team.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Universal Workspace; Docker Machines; Workspace Agents; Workspace Snapshots; Collaborative Workspaces; RESTful Workspaces; SSH / Terminal; Cloud IDE; Integrated Ops Environment; Multi-Machine; Multi-Project; Commands; Previews; Java Intellisense; JavaScript Intellisense; Light Theme; Plug-Ins; Open Source;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
58
Followers
54.5K
Followers
148
Votes
2.5K
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 12
    Cloud IDE
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 5
    Powerful
  • 2
    Can be locally hosted
  • 1
    Intelligent
Cons
  • 2
    LAck of support for golang
Integrations
No integrations available
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Docker
Docker
Jira
Jira
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Eclipse Che?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Built on the open Eclipse Che project, Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces provides developer workspaces, which include all the tools and the dependencies that are needed to code, build, test, run, and debug applications.

AWS Cloud9

AWS Cloud9

Cloud9 provides a development environment in the cloud. Cloud9 enables developers to get started with coding immediately with pre-setup environments called workspaces, collaborate with their peers with collaborative coding features, and build web apps with features like live preview and browser compatibility testing. It supports more than 40 languages, with class A support for PHP, Ruby, Python, JavaScript/Node.js, and Go.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Koding

Koding

Koding is a feature rich cloud-based development environment complete with free VMs, an attractive IDE & sudo level terminal access!

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Nitrous.IO

Nitrous.IO

Get setup lightning fast in the cloud & code from anywhere, on any machine.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana