Dust vs Hogan.js vs TypeScript

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Dust

7
17
+ 1
0
Hogan.js

323
45
+ 1
3
TypeScript

53.7K
41.2K
+ 1
462
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Dust
Pros of Hogan.js
Pros of TypeScript
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 3
      Lightweight
    • 163
      More intuitive and type safe javascript
    • 97
      Type safe
    • 73
      JavaScript superset
    • 46
      The best AltJS ever
    • 27
      Best AltJS for BackEnd
    • 14
      Powerful type system, including generics & JS features
    • 10
      Nice and seamless hybrid of static and dynamic typing
    • 9
      Aligned with ES development for compatibility
    • 9
      Compile time errors
    • 6
      Structural, rather than nominal, subtyping
    • 5
      Angular
    • 3
      Starts and ends with JavaScript

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Dust
    Cons of Hogan.js
    Cons of TypeScript
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        • 4
          Code may look heavy and confusing
        • 2
          Hype

        Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

        What is Dust?

        Dust is a JavaScript templating engine designed to provide a clean separation between presentation and logic without sacrificing ease of use. It is particularly well-suited for asynchronous and streaming applications.

        What is Hogan.js?

        Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

        What is TypeScript?

        TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

        Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

        What companies use Dust?
        What companies use Hogan.js?
        What companies use TypeScript?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Dust?
        What tools integrate with Hogan.js?
        What tools integrate with TypeScript?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        What are some alternatives to Dust, Hogan.js, and TypeScript?
        Handlebars.js
        Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.
        Mustache
        Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.
        Pug
        This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.
        Smarty
        Facilitating the separation of presentation (HTML/CSS) from application logic. This implies that PHP code is application logic, and is separated from the presentation
        Jinja
        It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.
        See all alternatives