StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Dust vs Handlebars.js vs TypeScript

Dust vs Handlebars.js vs TypeScript

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308
Dust
Dust
Stacks11
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.4K
Forks123
TypeScript
TypeScript
Stacks105.1K
Followers74.2K
Votes503
GitHub Stars106.6K
Forks13.1K

Dust vs Handlebars.js vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

<In this analysis, we will explore the key differences between Dust and Handlebars.js, as well as TypeScript.>

  1. Template Language Syntax: Dust uses a logic-less template language, which means it focuses on separating the logic from the presentation. On the other hand, Handlebars.js provides a templating language that allows for the embedding of logic directly into the templates, making it easier to work with conditional statements, loops, and helpers.

  2. Partials and Layouts: Handlebars.js has built-in support for partials, making it easier to reuse components across multiple templates. Dust, however, requires more manual setup to include partials or layouts in the templates, which can lead to more complexity in the codebase.

  3. Security Features: TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that adds static typing and other features to help catch errors at compile time, making it easier to write safer and more reliable code. Dust and Handlebars.js, on the other hand, do not offer these additional security features, which can make them more prone to runtime errors.

  4. Template Inheritance: Handlebars.js supports template inheritance, allowing for the creation of base templates that can be extended by child templates. Dust does not have built-in support for template inheritance, making it more challenging to create and manage complex template hierarchies.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: TypeScript has a large and active community with extensive documentation, third-party libraries, and tools available to support developers. While Handlebars.js also has a strong community, Dust may have a smaller ecosystem and fewer resources available for developers.

  6. Performance: Handlebars.js is known for its fast performance, with efficient template rendering and caching mechanisms in place. Dust, while still performant, may not offer the same level of optimization out of the box, requiring additional tuning for high-performance applications.

In Summary, the key differences between Dust, Handlebars.js, and TypeScript lie in their template language syntax, support for partials and layouts, security features, template inheritance capabilities, community and ecosystem support, and performance optimizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Dust
Dust
TypeScript
TypeScript

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Dust is a JavaScript templating engine designed to provide a clean separation between presentation and logic without sacrificing ease of use. It is particularly well-suited for asynchronous and streaming applications.

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.4K
GitHub Stars
106.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
123
GitHub Forks
13.1K
Stacks
8.3K
Stacks
11
Stacks
105.1K
Followers
3.2K
Followers
19
Followers
74.2K
Votes
308
Votes
0
Votes
503
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 173
    More intuitive and type safe javascript
  • 105
    Type safe
  • 80
    JavaScript superset
  • 48
    The best AltJS ever
  • 27
    Best AltJS for BackEnd
Cons
  • 5
    Code may look heavy and confusing
  • 4
    Hype
Integrations
Mustache
Mustache
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, Dust, TypeScript?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase