StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs Volt

.NET vs Volt

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.4K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
Volt
Volt
Stacks19
Followers54
Votes26
GitHub Stars3.2K
Forks194

.NET vs Volt: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of web development, two prominent frameworks, .NET and Volt, offer unique features and capabilities. Understanding the key differences between these frameworks is essential for developers to make informed decisions when selecting the appropriate technology for their projects.

  1. Language Compatibility: One significant difference between .NET and Volt is the programming languages they support. .NET primarily utilizes languages such as C# and VB.NET, while Volt is designed to work with the Ruby programming language. This difference in language compatibility can impact the development process and the skillset required for developers working with these frameworks.

  2. Platform Independence: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft, which is more closely tied to Windows operating systems. On the other hand, Volt is platform-independent, allowing developers to build applications that can run on various platforms without being restricted to a specific operating system. This platform independence gives Volt an advantage in terms of versatility and compatibility.

  3. Community Support and Ecosystem: .NET, being a product of Microsoft, has a large and established community with extensive documentation, resources, and support. This robust ecosystem provides developers with a wealth of tools and frameworks to enhance their projects. In contrast, Volt, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available compared to .NET.

  4. Hosting Options: .NET applications are commonly hosted on Windows servers, which may require specific configurations and dependencies. Volt, on the other hand, offers more flexibility in hosting options, allowing developers to deploy their applications on various hosting services and platforms. This difference in hosting options can impact deployment efficiency and cost considerations for developers.

  5. Performance and Scalability: .NET is known for its strong performance and scalability, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-level applications. Volt, on the other hand, offers high-speed performance due to its lightweight nature and simplicity. Depending on the project requirements, developers may need to consider the performance and scalability aspects of each framework to ensure optimal application functionality.

In Summary, understanding the language compatibility, platform independence, community support, hosting options, and performance differences between .NET and Volt is crucial for developers in selecting the right framework for their web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, Volt

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

Nov 28, 2020

Decided

I was considering focusing on learning RoR and looking for a work that uses those techs.

After some investigation, I decided to stay with C# .NET:

  • It is more requested on job positions (7 to 1 in my personal searches average).

  • It's been around for longer.

  • it has better documentation and community.

  • One of Ruby advantages (its amazing community gems, that allows to quickly build parts of your systems by merely putting together third party components) gets quite complicated to use and maintain in huge applications, where building and reusing your own components may become a better approach.

  • Rail's front end support is starting to waver.

  • C# .NET code is far easier to understand, debug and maintain. Although certainly not easier to learn from scratch.

  • Though Rails has an excellent programming speed, C# tends to get the upper hand in long term projects.

I would avise to stick to rails when building small projects, and switching to C# for more long term ones.

Opinions are welcome!

399k views399k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments
Noe
Noe

Software Engineer

Aug 13, 2021

Decided

Node Js have worked incredible great for me on every project I had. It is fast enough to support big and small apps, you do not have to worry about performance, because it is very capable of building a big REST API.

One advantage is that the learning curve is lower when you have used javascript on web browser as frontend, so, it is easy to migrate from Frontend to Backend with node.

Node Package Manager (NPM) has an incredible amount of packages from many developers, so you can use them on your project as you need them.

Code is easy to support, way different than Java Legacy code.

114k views114k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
Volt
Volt

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Volt is a ruby web framework where your ruby code runs on both the server and the client (via opal.) The DOM automatically update as the user interacts with the page. Page state can be stored in the URL, if the user hits a URL directly, the HTML will first be rendered on the server for faster load times and easier indexing by search engines.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
Instead of syncing data between the client and server via HTTP, volt uses a persistent connection between the client and server;When data is updated on one client, it is updated in the database and any other listening clients (with almost no setup code needed);Pages HTML is written in a handlebars like template language;Volt uses data flow/reactive programming to automatically and intelligently propagate changes to the DOM (or anything other code wanting to know when a value updates)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
3.2K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
194
Stacks
15.4K
Stacks
19
Followers
5.9K
Followers
54
Votes
1.9K
Votes
26
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 3
    Reactive Web Framework
  • 3
    Holy Grail (Server-Client)
  • 3
    Rich web applications
  • 3
    Open source
  • 3
    WebSockets
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to .NET, Volt?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase