StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs Laravel vs MEAN

.NET vs Laravel vs MEAN

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Laravel
Laravel
Stacks28.7K
Followers23.8K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars82.6K
Forks24.6K
.NET
.NET
Stacks15.4K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
MEAN
MEAN
Stacks337
Followers617
Votes594
GitHub Stars12.1K
Forks3.4K

.NET vs Laravel vs MEAN: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In the realm of web development, .NET, Laravel, and MEAN stack are three prominent frameworks that offer different features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these frameworks can help developers choose the right technology for their projects.

1. **Architecture**: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft for building web applications on the Windows platform. Laravel, on the other hand, is a PHP framework known for its elegant syntax and developer-friendly features. MEAN stack, which stands for MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js, is a full-stack JavaScript framework for building dynamic web applications.
   
2. **Language**: .NET primarily uses C# as its programming language, while Laravel utilizes PHP. In contrast, MEAN stack incorporates JavaScript throughout the entire development process, from the server-side to the client-side.

3. **Database**: .NET is commonly associated with Microsoft SQL Server as its preferred database system. Laravel has support for multiple databases, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite. MEAN stack, being a JavaScript-based framework, often uses MongoDB as its database, providing flexibility for JSON-like documents.

4. **Scalability**: .NET offers scalability and reliability on the Windows platform, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. Laravel provides scalability through features like queues and job scheduling. MEAN stack also offers horizontal scalability by utilizing microservices architecture.

5. **Community Support**: .NET has a large community of developers and resources provided by Microsoft. Laravel benefits from an active community that contributes to the growth of the framework through regular updates and extensions. MEAN stack, being an open-source framework, has a thriving community that continuously enhances the ecosystem with new features and improvements.

6. **Development Speed**: .NET provides a robust development environment with extensive tools and libraries, catering to rapid application development. Laravel is known for its speed and efficiency in building web applications, thanks to its clean and expressive syntax. MEAN stack's use of JavaScript throughout the stack offers a streamlined development process, enabling faster prototyping and deployment.

## Summary
In summary, the key differences between .NET, Laravel, and MEAN stack lie in their architecture, programming languages, database support, scalability features, community support, and development speed, each catering to different needs and preferences in web development. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Laravel, .NET, MEAN

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments
Eva
Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSpring BootSpring BootJavaScriptJavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k
Comments
washie
washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel
Laravel
.NET
.NET
MEAN
MEAN

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
82.6K
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
12.1K
GitHub Forks
24.6K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
28.7K
Stacks
15.4K
Stacks
337
Followers
23.8K
Followers
5.9K
Followers
617
Votes
3.9K
Votes
1.9K
Votes
594
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 556
    Clean architecture
  • 393
    Growing community
  • 371
    Composer friendly
  • 345
    Open source
  • 326
    The only framework to consider for php
Cons
  • 54
    PHP
  • 33
    Too many dependency
  • 23
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 86
    Javascript
  • 62
    Easy
  • 58
    Nosql
  • 52
    Great community
  • 50
    Mongoose
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Django
Django
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CakePHP
CakePHP
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
MongoDB
MongoDB
Node.js
Node.js
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Laravel, .NET, MEAN?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Play

Play

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase