Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

.NET

5.2K
4K
+ 1
1.7K
JavaScript

193.4K
147.9K
+ 1
7.7K
Add tool
Advice on .NET and JavaScript
Needs advice
on
Rust
Python
and
JavaScript

So, I've been working with all 3 languages JavaScript, Python and Rust, I know that all of these languages are important in their own domain but, I haven't took any of it to the point where i could say I'm a pro at any of these languages. I learned JS and Python out of my own excitement, I learned rust for some IoT based projects. just confused which one i should invest my time in first... that does have Job and freelance potential in market as well...

I am an undergraduate in computer science. (3rd Year)

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
JavaScript

I would start focusing on Javascript because even working with Rust and Python, you're always going to encounter some Javascript for front-ends at least. It has: - more freelancing opportunities (starting to work short after a virus/crisis, that's gonna help) - can also do back-end if needed (I would personally avoid specializing in this since there's better languages for the back-end part) - hard to avoid. it's everywhere and not going away (well not yet)

Then, later, for back-end programming languages, Rust seems like your best bet. Its pros: - it's satisfying to work with (after the learning curve) - it's got potential to grow big in the next year (also with better paying jobs) - it's super versatile (you can do high-perf system stuff, graphics, ffi, as well as your classic api server) It comes with a few cons though: - it's harder to learn (expect to put in years) - the freelancing options are virtually non-existent (and I would expect them to stay limited, as rust is better for long-term software than prototypes)

See more
Recommends
JavaScript

I suggest you to go with JavaScript. From my perspective JavaScript is the language you should invest your time in. The community of javascript and lots of framework helps developer to build what they want to build in no time whether it a desktop, web, mobile based application or even you can use javascript as a backend as well. There are lot of frameworks you can start learning i suggest you to go with (react,vue) library both are easy to learn than angular which is a complete framework.

And if you want to go with python as a secondary tool then i suggest you to learn a python framework (Flask,Django).

See more
Moinul Moin
Recommends
JavaScript

go for javascript, brother.

See more
View all (3)
Needs advice
on
JavaScript
Django
and
Dart

I am currently learning web development with Python and JavaScript course by CS50 Harvard university. It covers python, Flask, Django, SQL, Travis CI, javascript,HTML ,CSS and more. I am very interested in Flutter app development. Can I know what is the difference between learning these above-mentioned frameworks vs learning flutter directly? I am planning to learn flutter so that I can do both web development and app development. Are there any perks of learning these frameworks before flutter?

See more
Replies (5)
Recommends
Node.js

Hey Muhamed, For web development, you'll have to learn how to write backend APIs and how to build UI for browsers, apps, etc. If you're just starting off with programming, I'd suggest you stick to one language and trying developing everything using it to cut the unnecessary learning overhead. Although Python and JavaScript are very similar for beginners, JavaScript is the only available option for both frontend and backend development for a web application. You can start working with Node.js for your API development and Vanilla JS along with HTML/CSS for UI. You'll only need to learn one language to do all of this. Hope this helps.

See more
Dennis Barzanoff
Recommends
Dart

Flutter is good for everything and it is getting better as I am speaking. Flutter Web is almost ready for production and I have made 2 complex working websites already.

See more
Yohnathan Carletti
Senior Technical Product Manager · | 3 upvotes · 79.3K views
Recommends
Dart

From a management and hiring perspective, I recommend Flutter (Dart). It provides native solutions to both mobile platform ( (Android and IOS) while having the same knowledge. Hiring managers look at this as an advantage since a developer can provide solutions for both platforms whit the same knowledge. The Flutter framework is growing and there is a lot of resources to ground your knowledge and start experimenting. Dart is also a great language that covers most E2E necessities, so again, no further need of learning one language for FE and another for BE and services. It is my belief that Dart will surpass Kotlin soon, and will leverage to Python and Java in the upcoming year.

See more
Recommends
Dart

Well. Flutter is just a Framework (just like Django btw.) and it uses Dart as a programming language. Django is kind of solving a different problem than Dart. Dart is intened for use in Front End Applications and Django is a Framework for Back-End Web Development.

So if you want to program Flutter Apps (although i wouldn't recommend it for any serious web development yet since Flutter web isn't very mature yet) i would recommend you just lern Dart.

See more
Recommends
Dart

If you are interested in Flutter, learn it on your own time, parallel to the course. No matter what order you do them, eventually you will end up learning them all anyway ;-)

See more
View all (5)
Needs advice
on
Python
JavaScript
and
Go

We are converting AWS Lambdas from Java due to excessive cold start times. Usage: These lambdas handle XML and JSON payloads, they use s3, API Gateway, RDS, DynamoDB, and external API's. Most of our developers are only experienced in java. These three languages (Go, Node.js, and Python) were discussed, but no consensus has been reached yet.

See more
Replies (5)
Jordan Gregory
Sr. Software Engineer at Granular · | 4 upvotes · 87.1K views
Recommends
Go

I've worked with all three of these languages and also with Java developers converting to these languages and far and away Go is the easier one to convert to. With the improved cold-start times and the ease of conversion for a Java developer, it is a no-brainer for me.

The hardest part of the conversion though is going to be the lack of traditional Classes so you have to be mindful of that, but Go Structs and interfaces tend to make up for what is lost there.

Full Disclosure: I'm a 95% Go convert (from Python) at this point in time.

See more
Ahmet Yildirim
Software Engineering Consultant at UXCraft Sweden AB · | 3 upvotes · 87.1K views
Recommends
Go

Although I am primarily a Javascript developer myself, I used Go to build AWS lambda in a similar scenario to yours. AWS libraries felt better integrated on the Go side, I believe due to the language itself (e.g. how JSON objects are handled in go). Besides that performance of Go is much superior. But on the cons side; community is far smaller around Go, compared to Javascript. That is easy notice if you look at repos of community-maintained libraries for Go. That can feel a bit unreliable.

See more
Jason Scheirer
Senior Software Engineer at EasyPost · | 2 upvotes · 86.8K views
Recommends
Go

Go would provide the easiest transition for Java programmers -- its IDE/tooling is second to none (just install Goland) and the deploy/distribution story is extremely clean and lends itself to work well in lambda: single, static binaries with quick startup. No need to set up a full environment or package dependencies on your lambda AMIs, just copy a file.

See more
Paul Whittemore
Developer and Owner at Appurist Software · | 1 upvotes · 86.8K views
Recommends
Go

I was initially going to suggest JavaScript due to the smaller size needs of AWS Lambdas code and the larger range of libraries and community available (and to avoid Python for this). But I have to agree with the recommendations and rationale of @ayildirim above and I think you should choose any reasonable language that is low-overhead, fast startup, and best supported by AWS Lambda, and that is probably Go. I don't think you are likely to go wrong with that, while you can potentially with the others.

So I'd agree, on the strength of AWS Lambda support and the solid performance of Go, it seems like your best choice here for Lambdas (and I'm going to need to consider that myself going forward... pardon the pun).

See more
Russel Werner
Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 1 upvotes · 86.8K views

If you want to prioritise language familiarity, JavaScript is more like Java than the other choices; and it can be optimised to run very fast. However if you need really fast cold-start times, you can't beat Go since it's compiled. There are other things to consider, such as the massive amount of community packages and help/documentation in the JavaScript ecosystem. Go is newer but seems to be quite popular if you need something that runs fast in a single binary.

See more
View all (5)
Decisions about .NET and JavaScript
Lucas Litton
Director of Strategy at DigitalSignal · | 8 upvotes · 92.2K views

JavaScript is at the forefront of our entire development approach. Not only do we use different JavaScript frameworks and management tools, but we also use pure vanilla JavaScript to solve simple problems throughout all of our client's builds. JavaScript is a general purpose programming language that can be blazing fast and fun to work with. There's not one project we are working on that doesn't involve it.

See more
William Artero
Senior Platform Engineer at ABN AMRO · | 6 upvotes · 114K views

Telegram Messenger has frameworks for most known languages, which makes easier for anyone to integrate with them. I started with Golang and soon found that those frameworks are not up to date, not to mention my experience testing on Golang is also mixed due to how their testing tool works. The natural runner-up was JS, which I'm ditching in favor of TS to make a strongly typed code, proper tests and documentation for broader usage. TypeScript allows fast prototyping and can prevent problems during code phase, given that your IDE of choice has support for a language server, and build phase. Pairing it with lint tools also allows honing code before it even hits the repositories.

See more
Andrew Carpenter
Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC · | 16 upvotes · 152.9K views

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of .NET
Pros of JavaScript
  • 261
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 250
    Stable code
  • 180
    Great community
  • 171
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 132
    Microsoft
  • 108
    Fantastic documentation
  • 82
    Great 3rd party libraries
  • 71
    Speedy
  • 65
    Great azure integration
  • 57
    Great support
  • 25
    Highly productive
  • 24
    Linq
  • 23
    High Performance
  • 22
    Great programming languages (C#, VB)
  • 21
    C#
  • 19
    Open source
  • 13
    Clean markup with razor
  • 13
    Powerful Web application framework (ASP.NET MVC)
  • 13
    Powerful ORM (EntityFramework)
  • 11
    Fast
  • 9
    Constantly improving to keep up with new trends
  • 9
    Visual studio + Resharper = <3
  • 8
    Dependency injection
  • 7
    TFS
  • 6
    Job opportunities
  • 6
    High-Performance
  • 6
    Integrated and Reliable
  • 6
    Security
  • 5
    Huge ecosystem and communities
  • 5
    Light-weight
  • 4
    Variations
  • 4
    Lovely
  • 3
    Scaffolding
  • 3
    Support and SImplicity
  • 3
    {get; set;}
  • 3
    Asynchrony
  • 3
    Concurrent
  • 3
    Useful IoC
  • 2
    Entity framework
  • 2
    Default Debuging tools
  • 1
    Blazor
  • 1.6K
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1.5K
    It's everywhere
  • 1.1K
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 884
    Fast
  • 733
    Light weight
  • 412
    Flexible
  • 378
    You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
  • 280
    Non-blocking i/o
  • 230
    Ubiquitousness
  • 185
    Expressive
  • 49
    Extended functionality to web pages
  • 42
    Relatively easy language
  • 40
    Executed on the client side
  • 24
    Relatively fast to the end user
  • 20
    Pure Javascript
  • 15
    Functional programming
  • 9
    Async
  • 7
    Setup is easy
  • 6
    JavaScript is the New PHP
  • 6
    Full-stack
  • 6
    Because I love functions
  • 5
    Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
  • 5
    Future Language of The Web
  • 5
    Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
  • 5
    Its everywhere
  • 5
    Expansive community
  • 4
    Everyone use it
  • 4
    Supports lambdas and closures
  • 4
    Love-hate relationship
  • 4
    Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
  • 4
    Evolution of C
  • 4
    For the good parts
  • 4
    Easy to hire developers
  • 3
    Only Programming language on browser
  • 3
    Nice
  • 3
    Easy to make something
  • 3
    Promise relationship
  • 3
    Scope manipulation
  • 3
    Hard not to use
  • 3
    Client processing
  • 3
    Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
  • 3
    Stockholm Syndrome
  • 3
    Clojurescript
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
  • 3
    Most Popular Language in the World
  • 3
    Versitile
  • 3
    No need to use PHP
  • 3
    Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
  • 3
    Function expressions are useful for callbacks
  • 3
    Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
  • 3
    Because it is so simple and lightweight
  • 3
    Its fun and fast
  • 3
    It let's me use Babel & Typescript
  • 3
    What to add
  • 3
    1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 3
    Powerful
  • 3
    It's fun
  • 3
    Everywhere
  • 3
    Agile, packages simple to use
  • 1
    JavaScript j.s
  • 1
    Acoperișul 0757604335

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of .NET
Cons of JavaScript
  • 9
    C#
  • 9
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 7
    Microsoft itself
  • 6
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 3
    Hard learning curve
  • 1
    Not have a full fledged visual studio for linux
  • 21
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 14
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 8
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 6
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
  • 5
    Can be ugly
  • 4
    Thinks strange results are better than errors
  • 2
    No GitHub
  • 1
    Slow

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is .NET?

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

What is JavaScript?

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use .NET?
What companies use JavaScript?
See which teams inside your own company are using .NET or JavaScript.
Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with .NET?
What tools integrate with JavaScript?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

+3
6
895
May 6 2020 at 6:34AM

Pinterest

+6
3
1998
+12
5
3250
Oct 24 2019 at 7:43PM

AppSignal

+8
5
685
Oct 11 2019 at 2:36PM

LogRocket

+8
5
1511
Oct 3 2019 at 7:13PM

Ably Realtime

+8
4
3197
What are some alternatives to .NET and JavaScript?
ASP.NET
.NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.
Java
Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!
Python
Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
PHP
Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.
Node.js
Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
See all alternatives
Reviews of .NET and JavaScript
Review of
JavaScript

excellent!!

How developers use .NET and JavaScript
Andrew Faulkner uses
JavaScript

Almost the entire app was written in Javascript, with JSON-based configuration and data storage. The following components were written and/or configured with Javascript:

  • Most server-side scripts, all unit tests, all build tools, etc. were driven by NodeJS.
  • ExpressJS served as the 'backend' server framework.
  • MongoDB (which stores essential JSON) was the main database.
  • MongooseJS was used as the main ORM for communicating with the database, with KnexJS used for certain edge cases.
  • MochaJS, ChaiJS, and ExpectJS were used for unit testing.
  • Frontend builds were done with Gulp and Webpack.
  • Package management was done primarily with npm - with a few exceptions that required the use of Bower (also configured with JSON).
  • "Templating" was done with Javascript dialect JSX.
  • The frontend was build primarily with ReactJS (as the View) and Redux (as the Controller / Store / frontend model).
  • Configuration was done with json files.

The only notable exceptions were the use of SCSS (augmented by Compass) for styling, Bash for a few basic 'system chores' and CLI utilities required for development of the app (most notably git and heroku's CLI interface), and a bit of custom SQL for locations where the ORM extractions leaked (the app is DB-agnostic, but a bit of SQL was required to fill gaps in the ORMs when interfacing with Postgres).

OutSystems uses
JavaScript

Read more on how to extend the OutSystems UI with Javascript here.

OutSystems provides a very simple to use AJAX mechanism. However, developers can also use JavaScript extensively to customize how users interact with their applications, to create client side custom validations and dynamic behaviors, or even to create custom, very specific, AJAX interactions. For example, each application can have an application-wide defined JavaScript file or set of files included in resources. Page-specific JavaScript can also be defined.

Gorka Llona uses
JavaScript

This GNU/GPL licensed Javascript library allows you to draw complex organizational charts that can't be drawn using Google's tool or equivalents. Orgchart structures are specified with JSON and can be generated on-the-fly by server-side scripts and databases. Events can be attached to clicks over the boxes. Multiple options can be defined; look at the repo for examples. This 1300-code-lines software component with contributors from 8 countries (and others for which I have to integrate their works) appears in the first page of Google Search results when searching for "Javascript Organizational Chart Library".

Cloudcraft uses
JavaScript

JavaScript gets a bad rep, quite undeservedly so in my opinion. Today, JS is closer to functional languages than to the traditional-OO languages, and when used as such provides a great development experience. The pace of development is just picking up with transpilers like Babel making future advanced language features available to the masses today. At Cloudcraft.co, we write 100% of both the front-end (with React) and the backend (with Node.js) in Javascript, using the latest ES6 and even some ES7 features. This is not your grandfather's Javascript!

MOKA Analytics uses
JavaScript

The application front-end is written in JavaScript (ES6). We originally selected it over TypeScript because many library typings at the time were still flaky and the transpilation time was slow.

We are now re-considering TypeScript because 1) the tooling has improved significantly, and 2) and the root cause of the majority of our front-end bugs are related to typing (despite having PropTypes).

Brillium, Inc. uses
.NET

Microsoft has done an incredible job of keeping the .NET Framework powerful and stable. It is well designed and keeps getting more robust with each release. It isn't the most popular technology in this space, but I think a good case can be made to use .NET in many new projects.

Foundbite uses
.NET

As we started on Windows Phone we use C# and .NET for most of our apps and sites. Being a small team of 2, using .NET enables us to work on each part of the service without having to switch to different languages.

Daniel Kovacs uses
.NET

I use .NET alongside with C# since my university studies, and I really enjoy it. Especially .NET Core, which is the best thing that happened to Microsoft since... ever.

Yue Wang uses
.NET

Server side development language and frameworks: ASP.Net MVC 4, Asp.Net WebApi 2, Razor View engine, Moq, Entity Frameworks, etc.

Twincore Systems uses
.NET

TwinCore creates modern web and cloud applications based on .NET TwinCore supports legacy .NET applications