StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs Handlebars.js

.NET vs Handlebars.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.4K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308

.NET vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this task, we will provide the key differences between .NET and Handlebars.js and format it as Markdown code for easier usage in a website.

  1. Syntax and Language: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft for building applications on the Windows platform, primarily using languages like C# and Visual Basic. It follows an object-oriented programming approach and uses a different syntax compared to Handlebars.js. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is a templating engine that focuses on the client-side and is primarily used for generating HTML content dynamically using JavaScript.

  2. Server-side vs. Client-side: .NET is primarily used for server-side development and can be integrated with various web frameworks like ASP.NET, providing a full-stack solution for web application development. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is designed to work on the client-side, running in a web browser, and allows for dynamic HTML generation without the need for server-side processing.

  3. Integrations and Extensibility: .NET offers a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools for developing both web and desktop applications. It has extensive integration with various Microsoft products and services like Azure, SQL Server, Visual Studio, etc. Additionally, it provides a robust ecosystem for building modular and extensible applications. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is a lightweight templating engine that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a limited but powerful set of features for generating HTML, making it ideal for small to medium-sized web projects.

  4. Data Binding: .NET provides a comprehensive set of data binding capabilities, allowing developers to establish strong connections between data sources and user interfaces. It supports two-way data binding, making it easy to update the user interface when the underlying data changes. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, does not provide built-in data binding capabilities. It primarily focuses on generating HTML content based on provided data, without automatically updating the UI when the data changes.

  5. Server-side Rendering: .NET, with frameworks like ASP.NET, offers server-side rendering capabilities, which means that the server processes the web page and sends a fully rendered HTML to the client's browser. This approach allows for better SEO, initial page load performance, and compatibility with older browsers. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is primarily designed for client-side rendering, where the template is sent to the browser, and the actual HTML generation happens in the client's browser using JavaScript.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: .NET has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It is backed by Microsoft and has a well-established ecosystem with a wide range of tools, libraries, and frameworks. Handlebars.js, while popular in the JavaScript community, has a smaller ecosystem compared to .NET. It has fewer resources and community support compared to .NET but still offers a solid solution for client-side HTML generation.

In summary, .NET is a comprehensive framework for building applications on the Windows platform, offering server-side development, data binding, extensive integrations, and a strong ecosystem. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is a lightweight templating engine focused on client-side HTML generation, providing simplicity and ease of use for smaller web projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, Handlebars.js

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments
Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
15.4K
Stacks
8.3K
Followers
5.9K
Followers
3.2K
Votes
1.9K
Votes
308
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
Mustache
Mustache

What are some alternatives to .NET, Handlebars.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase