Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
.NET vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this task, we will provide the key differences between .NET and Handlebars.js and format it as Markdown code for easier usage in a website.
Syntax and Language: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft for building applications on the Windows platform, primarily using languages like C# and Visual Basic. It follows an object-oriented programming approach and uses a different syntax compared to Handlebars.js. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is a templating engine that focuses on the client-side and is primarily used for generating HTML content dynamically using JavaScript.
Server-side vs. Client-side: .NET is primarily used for server-side development and can be integrated with various web frameworks like ASP.NET, providing a full-stack solution for web application development. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is designed to work on the client-side, running in a web browser, and allows for dynamic HTML generation without the need for server-side processing.
Integrations and Extensibility: .NET offers a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools for developing both web and desktop applications. It has extensive integration with various Microsoft products and services like Azure, SQL Server, Visual Studio, etc. Additionally, it provides a robust ecosystem for building modular and extensible applications. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is a lightweight templating engine that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a limited but powerful set of features for generating HTML, making it ideal for small to medium-sized web projects.
Data Binding: .NET provides a comprehensive set of data binding capabilities, allowing developers to establish strong connections between data sources and user interfaces. It supports two-way data binding, making it easy to update the user interface when the underlying data changes. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, does not provide built-in data binding capabilities. It primarily focuses on generating HTML content based on provided data, without automatically updating the UI when the data changes.
Server-side Rendering: .NET, with frameworks like ASP.NET, offers server-side rendering capabilities, which means that the server processes the web page and sends a fully rendered HTML to the client's browser. This approach allows for better SEO, initial page load performance, and compatibility with older browsers. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is primarily designed for client-side rendering, where the template is sent to the browser, and the actual HTML generation happens in the client's browser using JavaScript.
Ecosystem and Community: .NET has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It is backed by Microsoft and has a well-established ecosystem with a wide range of tools, libraries, and frameworks. Handlebars.js, while popular in the JavaScript community, has a smaller ecosystem compared to .NET. It has fewer resources and community support compared to .NET but still offers a solid solution for client-side HTML generation.
In summary, .NET is a comprehensive framework for building applications on the Windows platform, offering server-side development, data binding, extensive integrations, and a strong ecosystem. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is a lightweight templating engine focused on client-side HTML generation, providing simplicity and ease of use for smaller web projects.
@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.
Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?
Thanks In Advance
I like Handlebars, it's very mature... some would say-- outdated.
Handlebars loops are done via {{#each myList}}. Read the docs! https://handlebarsjs.com/guide
Remember, don't put logic in your templates! Keep this layer simple. Sorry to hear you have to use dotNet.
Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.
Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.
Pros of .NET
- Tight integration with visual studio272
- Stable code261
- Great community190
- Reliable and strongly typed server side language.182
- Microsoft140
- Fantastic documentation119
- Great 3rd party libraries89
- Speedy80
- Great azure integration71
- Great support63
- Highly productive34
- Linq34
- C#34
- High Performance31
- Great programming languages (C#, VB)28
- Open source26
- Powerful Web application framework (ASP.NET MVC)19
- Fast16
- Clean markup with razor16
- Powerful ORM (EntityFramework)15
- Dependency injection14
- Visual studio + Resharper = <310
- Constantly improving to keep up with new trends10
- High-Performance9
- TFS8
- Security8
- Job opportunities7
- Integrated and Reliable7
- Huge ecosystem and communities7
- Light-weight6
- Lovely6
- {get; set;}5
- Variations5
- Asynchrony5
- Scaffolding4
- Support and SImplicity4
- Default Debuging tools4
- Concurrent4
- Useful IoC4
- Entity framework4
- Nuget package manager3
- Blazor3
- F♯2
Pros of Handlebars.js
- Simple106
- Great templating language76
- Open source50
- Logicless36
- Integrates well into any codebase20
- Easy to create helper methods for complex scenarios10
- Created by Yehuda Katz7
- Easy For Fornt End Developers,learn backend2
- Awesome1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of .NET
- C#13
- Too expensive to deploy and maintain12
- Microsoft dependable systems8
- Microsoft itself8
- Hard learning curve5
- Tight integration with visual studio3
- Not have a full fledged visual studio for linux3
- Microsoft itself 🤡🥲1