.NET vs GraphQL

Overview

.NET

Stacks15.4K

Followers5.9K

Votes1.9K

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

GraphQL

Stacks34.9K

Followers28.1K

Votes309

.NET vs GraphQL: What are the differences?

Introduction

The following is a comparison between .NET and GraphQL, outlining the key differences between the two technologies:

Performance and Scalability: When it comes to performance and scalability, .NET provides a high-performance framework for building web applications. It is capable of handling large amounts of traffic and can efficiently scale to meet the demands of high-traffic websites. On the other hand, GraphQL is a query language for APIs that allows clients to request specific data and reduce unnecessary data transfers, resulting in improved performance and better utilization of network resources.
Data Fetching: .NET uses a traditional RESTful approach to data fetching, where multiple endpoints are created for different resources. This can lead to over-fetching or under-fetching of data, as the entire resource is returned even if only a subset of the data is needed. In contrast, GraphQL provides a single endpoint where clients can specify exactly what data they need, reducing the amount of data transferred and allowing for more efficient data fetching.
Flexibility and Customization: .NET offers a wide range of frameworks and libraries that can be used to build web applications, allowing developers to choose the tools that best suit their needs. It provides a comprehensive set of features and allows for extensive customization. GraphQL, on the other hand, provides a flexible and strongly-typed schema that can be easily adapted to different data models and allows clients to request only the fields they need, providing a more customizable and efficient data fetching experience.
API Versioning: In .NET, API versioning is typically achieved by creating different endpoints for different versions of an API. This can result in a complex and cumbersome API structure, making it difficult to maintain and evolve the API over time. GraphQL, on the other hand, provides built-in versioning capabilities, allowing developers to evolve the API without breaking existing clients. This simplifies the API versioning process and makes it easier to introduce new features or deprecate existing ones.
Type Safety: .NET is a statically-typed language, which means that type checking is performed at compile-time, reducing the chances of runtime errors. This allows developers to catch potential errors early on in the development process. GraphQL, on the other hand, is dynamically-typed, meaning that type checking is performed at runtime. This provides more flexibility but also increases the chances of runtime errors.
Tooling and Ecosystem: .NET has a mature and extensive ecosystem of tools, libraries, and frameworks that support various aspects of web development. This includes IDEs, build tools, testing frameworks, and more. GraphQL, although growing rapidly, has a smaller ecosystem by comparison. However, it does have a growing number of tools and libraries that support GraphQL development, such as GraphQL clients and server frameworks.

In summary, .NET provides a high-performance, scalable framework with a wide range of tools and customization options. It uses a RESTful approach to data fetching and requires multiple endpoints for different resources. On the other hand, GraphQL offers improved performance and flexibility with a single endpoint for data fetching. It allows clients to request only the data they need and provides built-in versioning capabilities. GraphQL is dynamically-typed and has a smaller ecosystem compared to .NET.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET, GraphQL

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET	GraphQL
.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.	GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.	Hierarchical;Product-centric;Client-specified queries;Backwards Compatible;Structured, Arbitrary Code;Application-Layer Protocol;Strongly-typed;Introspective
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 15.4K	Stacks 34.9K
Followers 5.9K	Followers 28.1K
Votes 1.9K	Votes 309
Pros & Cons
Pros 273 Tight integration with visual studio 262 Stable code 191 Great community 184 Reliable and strongly typed server side language. 141 Microsoft Cons 13 C# 12 Too expensive to deploy and maintain 8 Microsoft itself 8 Microsoft dependable systems 5 Hard learning curve	Pros 75 Schemas defined by the requests made by the user 63 Will replace RESTful interfaces 62 The future of API's 49 The future of databases 12 Get many resources in a single request Cons 4 Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology 4 More code to type. 2 Takes longer to build compared to schemaless. 1 All the pros sound like NFT pitches 1 Works just like any other API at runtime
Integrations
C# Microsoft Azure F# Xamarin Visual Basic	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to .NET, GraphQL?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

.NET vs GraphQL: What are the differences?

Introduction

The following is a comparison between .NET and GraphQL, outlining the key differences between the two technologies:

Performance and Scalability: When it comes to performance and scalability, .NET provides a high-performance framework for building web applications. It is capable of handling large amounts of traffic and can efficiently scale to meet the demands of high-traffic websites. On the other hand, GraphQL is a query language for APIs that allows clients to request specific data and reduce unnecessary data transfers, resulting in improved performance and better utilization of network resources.
Data Fetching: .NET uses a traditional RESTful approach to data fetching, where multiple endpoints are created for different resources. This can lead to over-fetching or under-fetching of data, as the entire resource is returned even if only a subset of the data is needed. In contrast, GraphQL provides a single endpoint where clients can specify exactly what data they need, reducing the amount of data transferred and allowing for more efficient data fetching.
Flexibility and Customization: .NET offers a wide range of frameworks and libraries that can be used to build web applications, allowing developers to choose the tools that best suit their needs. It provides a comprehensive set of features and allows for extensive customization. GraphQL, on the other hand, provides a flexible and strongly-typed schema that can be easily adapted to different data models and allows clients to request only the fields they need, providing a more customizable and efficient data fetching experience.
API Versioning: In .NET, API versioning is typically achieved by creating different endpoints for different versions of an API. This can result in a complex and cumbersome API structure, making it difficult to maintain and evolve the API over time. GraphQL, on the other hand, provides built-in versioning capabilities, allowing developers to evolve the API without breaking existing clients. This simplifies the API versioning process and makes it easier to introduce new features or deprecate existing ones.
Type Safety: .NET is a statically-typed language, which means that type checking is performed at compile-time, reducing the chances of runtime errors. This allows developers to catch potential errors early on in the development process. GraphQL, on the other hand, is dynamically-typed, meaning that type checking is performed at runtime. This provides more flexibility but also increases the chances of runtime errors.
Tooling and Ecosystem: .NET has a mature and extensive ecosystem of tools, libraries, and frameworks that support various aspects of web development. This includes IDEs, build tools, testing frameworks, and more. GraphQL, although growing rapidly, has a smaller ecosystem by comparison. However, it does have a growing number of tools and libraries that support GraphQL development, such as GraphQL clients and server frameworks.

.NET vs GraphQL

Overview

.NET vs GraphQL: What are the differences?