Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Docusaurus

117
353
+ 1
33
Wiki.js

37
120
+ 1
2
Add tool

Docusaurus vs Wiki.js: What are the differences?

Docusaurus: Easy to maintain open source documentation websites. Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites; Wiki.js: A wiki engine running on Node.js and written in JavaScript. It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.

Docusaurus and Wiki.js can be categorized as "Documentation as a Service &" tools.

Some of the features offered by Docusaurus are:

  • Powered by Markdown
  • Built using React
  • Ready for translations

On the other hand, Wiki.js provides the following key features:

  • Page Permissions
  • Authentication Backends
  • Host Blocking

Docusaurus and Wiki.js are both open source tools. Docusaurus with 13.5K GitHub stars and 1.25K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Wiki.js with 5.39K GitHub stars and 722 GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Docusaurus
Pros of Wiki.js
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 7
    Self Hosted
  • 3
    Easy customization
  • 3
    Jamstack
  • 3
    MDX
  • 3
    React
  • 3
    Free to use
  • 2
    I18n
  • 2
    Versioning
  • 1
    Fast speed by node.js
  • 1
    Open Source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Docusaurus
Cons of Wiki.js
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      No tree structure by default

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Docusaurus?

    Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

    What is Wiki.js?

    It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Docusaurus?
    What companies use Wiki.js?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Docusaurus or Wiki.js.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Docusaurus?
    What tools integrate with Wiki.js?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Docusaurus and Wiki.js?
    Confluence
    Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
    Gitbook
    It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.
    MkDocs
    It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.
    VuePress
    A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
    Hugo
    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
    See all alternatives