Docsify vs Jekyll

Overview

Jekyll

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.4K

Votes230

GitHub Stars51.0K

Forks10.2K

Docsify

Stacks37

Followers136

Votes0

Docsify vs Jekyll: What are the differences?

Comparison between Docsify and Jekyll

Docsify and Jekyll are both popular static site generators that allow developers to build websites. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

Ease of Use: Docsify is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It requires minimal setup and configuration, making it an ideal choice for beginners or those who prefer a seamless development experience. On the other hand, Jekyll has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical knowledge to set up and customize.
Themes and Templates: Docsify offers a limited selection of themes and templates, which may be a drawback for those looking for more design options. Jekyll, on the other hand, provides a wide range of themes and templates that can be easily customized to suit individual needs and preferences.
Dynamic Content: Jekyll allows for more dynamic content generation as it supports features such as data files and collections. This makes it easier to manage and display dynamic content on the website. Docsify, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a seamless reading experience for documentation-style websites.
Plugins and Extensions: Jekyll has a robust ecosystem of plugins and extensions that allow developers to extend its functionality. These plugins can be used to add additional features or automate certain tasks. In contrast, Docsify has a more limited selection of plugins and extensions available.
Community Support: Jekyll has a larger and more active community compared to Docsify. This means there are more resources, tutorials, and support available for Jekyll users. This can be particularly helpful for developers who encounter issues or need guidance during the development process.
Hosting and Deployment: Docsify can be hosted on various platforms such as GitHub Pages, Netlify, or any standard web hosting service. Jekyll, being a Ruby-based platform, is often hosted on GitHub Pages. However, it can also be deployed on other web hosting platforms with Ruby support.

In summary, while Docsify offers ease of use and simplicity, Jekyll provides more flexibility, customization options, and dynamic content capabilities, making it suitable for more complex websites.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jekyll, Docsify

Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k

Comments

Kazim

Founder & Developer at Devkind

May 13, 2020

Needs advice

Fastest and quickest way to do static HTML site which is extremely fast? Do you consider above tools or is there anything more quicker or better? This is just a one time one pager site for now, no backend required. I might have such projects in future, having something to get familiar with which can immediately come into action to develop would be great advise!

53.6k views53.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jekyll	Docsify
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.	Docsify generates your documentation website on the fly without generating static html files. Instead, it loads and parses your Markdown files and displays them as a website.
Simple - No more databases, comment moderation, or pesky updates to install—just your content.;Static - Markdown (or Textile), Liquid, HTML & CSS go in. Static sites come out ready for deployment.;Blog-aware - Permalinks, categories, pages, posts, and custom layouts are all first-class citizens here.	No statically built html files;Simple and lightweight (~18kB gzipped);Smart full-text search plugin;Multiple themes;Useful plugin API;Emoji support;Compatible with IE10+;Supports SSR
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 10.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 2.0K	Stacks 37
Followers 1.4K	Followers 136
Votes 230	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 74 Github pages integration 54 Open source 37 It's slick, customisable and hackerish 24 Easy to deploy 23 Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset Cons 4 Build time increases exponentially as site grows 2 Lack of developments lately 1 Og doesn't work with postings dynamically	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Jekyll, Docsify?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs Swagger UI

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

Docsify vs Jekyll: What are the differences?

Comparison between Docsify and Jekyll

Docsify and Jekyll are both popular static site generators that allow developers to build websites. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

Ease of Use: Docsify is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It requires minimal setup and configuration, making it an ideal choice for beginners or those who prefer a seamless development experience. On the other hand, Jekyll has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical knowledge to set up and customize.
Themes and Templates: Docsify offers a limited selection of themes and templates, which may be a drawback for those looking for more design options. Jekyll, on the other hand, provides a wide range of themes and templates that can be easily customized to suit individual needs and preferences.
Dynamic Content: Jekyll allows for more dynamic content generation as it supports features such as data files and collections. This makes it easier to manage and display dynamic content on the website. Docsify, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a seamless reading experience for documentation-style websites.
Plugins and Extensions: Jekyll has a robust ecosystem of plugins and extensions that allow developers to extend its functionality. These plugins can be used to add additional features or automate certain tasks. In contrast, Docsify has a more limited selection of plugins and extensions available.
Community Support: Jekyll has a larger and more active community compared to Docsify. This means there are more resources, tutorials, and support available for Jekyll users. This can be particularly helpful for developers who encounter issues or need guidance during the development process.
Hosting and Deployment: Docsify can be hosted on various platforms such as GitHub Pages, Netlify, or any standard web hosting service. Jekyll, being a Ruby-based platform, is often hosted on GitHub Pages. However, it can also be deployed on other web hosting platforms with Ruby support.

In summary, while Docsify offers ease of use and simplicity, Jekyll provides more flexibility, customization options, and dynamic content capabilities, making it suitable for more complex websites.