StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Docker vs Sauce Labs

Docker vs Sauce Labs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Stacks314
Followers435
Votes438
Docker
Docker
Stacks194.2K
Followers143.8K
Votes3.9K

Docker vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Environment: Docker is primarily used for containerization, allowing developers to package applications and dependencies into a container that can run on any system with Docker installed. On the other hand, Sauce Labs is a cloud-based platform focused on providing automated testing tools for web and mobile applications.
  2. Testing Capabilities: While Docker focuses on packaging and deploying applications, Sauce Labs specializes in providing a wide range of testing capabilities such as automated cross-browser and mobile testing, parallel testing, and real-time debugging tools.
  3. Integration with CI/CD: Docker is commonly integrated into the CI/CD pipelines to automate the building and deployment of applications. In contrast, Sauce Labs is integrated into the testing phase of the CI/CD pipeline to ensure that applications are thoroughly tested across various platforms and environments.
  4. Scalability: Docker containers can be easily scaled horizontally or vertically to meet the demands of applications or services. On the other hand, Sauce Labs provides scalable testing infrastructure to run tests concurrently on multiple virtual machines and devices, ensuring quick feedback on application performance and functionality.
  5. Security Features: Docker provides various security features such as isolation of containers, resource limitations, and secure image repositories. Sauce Labs, being a cloud-based platform, offers security measures like data encryption, secure tunnels for testing on internal servers, and compliance with industry standards to protect sensitive data during the testing process.
  6. Management Complexity: Docker requires the management of container orchestration tools like Kubernetes for deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. In contrast, Sauce Labs handles the infrastructure management, allowing users to focus solely on writing and executing tests without the need for complex setup or maintenance tasks.

In Summary, Docker and Sauce Labs differ in their primary focus on containerization and deployment versus cloud-based automated testing tools, respectively, with differences in testing capabilities, integration with CI/CD, scalability, security features, and management complexity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sauce Labs, Docker

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments
Florian
Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Docker
Docker

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion
Statistics
Stacks
314
Stacks
194.2K
Followers
435
Followers
143.8K
Votes
438
Votes
3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 2
    Relatively slow
Pros
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
Integrations
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Appium
Appium
Jenkins
Jenkins
Selenium
Selenium
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
TeamCity
TeamCity
Applitools
Applitools
Bamboo
Bamboo
Java
Java
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Linux
Linux
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
boot2docker
boot2docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Vagrant
Vagrant

What are some alternatives to Sauce Labs, Docker?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana