StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Virtual Machine Platforms And Containers
  5. Docker vs OSGi

Docker vs OSGi

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker
Docker
Stacks194.2K
Followers143.8K
Votes3.9K
OSGi
OSGi
Stacks78
Followers118
Votes10

Docker vs OSGi: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Docker and OSGi.

  1. Containerization vs. Modularization: Docker focuses on containerization, which allows applications to be packaged with their dependencies and run in isolated environments. OSGi, on the other hand, focuses on modularization, where applications are broken down into smaller, reusable modules that can be dynamically installed, updated, and uninstalled.

  2. Deployment Model: Docker uses a single-container deployment model, where an application and its dependencies are packaged into a container image and deployed as a single unit. OSGi, on the other hand, uses a more granular deployment model, where applications can be composed of multiple modules that can be installed, updated, and uninstalled independently.

  3. Runtime Environment: Docker provides a consistent runtime environment across different operating systems and hardware architectures. OSGi, on the other hand, relies on a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and is primarily used in Java-based applications.

  4. Isolation: Docker offers process-level isolation, where each container runs in its own isolated process namespace. OSGi, on the other hand, offers a more fine-grained isolation at the module-level, where modules can be isolated and have their own classpaths.

  5. Dependency Management: Docker simplifies dependency management by packaging applications with their dependencies into container images. OSGi, on the other hand, provides a more dynamic approach to dependency management, where modules can explicitly declare their dependencies and have them resolved at runtime.

  6. Scalability: Docker enables horizontal scalability by allowing multiple instances of the same container image to be deployed across different hosts. OSGi, on the other hand, provides a more fine-grained scalability model, where individual modules can be dynamically installed and uninstalled based on the needs of the application.

In summary, Docker focuses on containerization, providing a consistent runtime environment, process-level isolation, and simplified dependency management, while OSGi focuses on modularization, providing a more granular deployment model, module-level isolation, dynamic dependency management, and fine-grained scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Docker, OSGi

Florian
Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker
Docker
OSGi
OSGi

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

It is a Java framework for developing and deploying modular software programs and libraries. It provides a vendor-independent, standards-based approach to modularizing Java software applications and infrastructure.

Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion
-
Statistics
Stacks
194.2K
Stacks
78
Followers
143.8K
Followers
118
Votes
3.9K
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
Pros
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Component-based platform
  • 2
    Componentization of software modules
  • 1
    Dynamically deploy your code at anytime w/o downtime
  • 1
    pre-built
Cons
  • 1
    Bound to eclipse
Integrations
Java
Java
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Linux
Linux
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
boot2docker
boot2docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Vagrant
Vagrant
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker, OSGi?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot