Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Docker vs Helm: What are the differences?
## Introduction
Key differences between Docker and Helm are outlined below:
1. **Containerization vs. Package Manager**: Docker is a containerization platform that allows you to create, deploy, and run applications in containers, while Helm is a package manager for Kubernetes that simplifies the deployment and management of applications within Kubernetes clusters.
2. **Single Application vs. Multiple Applications**: Docker focuses on containerizing single applications, providing isolation and portability, whereas Helm is designed to manage multiple applications within a Kubernetes cluster, enabling easy installation, upgrading, and deletion of complex sets of microservices.
3. **Configuration Management**: Docker uses Dockerfiles to define the build process and configurations for individual containers, allowing for customization at the container level. In contrast, Helm uses charts to define application models and customizable templates, providing a higher level of abstraction for managing configurations across multiple deployments.
4. **Dependency Management**: Docker does not natively support dependency management between containers, requiring users to handle dependencies manually or using external tools. On the other hand, Helm offers dependency management through chart dependencies, simplifying the installation and management of complex applications with interdependent components.
5. **Versioning and Rollbacks**: Docker enables versioning at the container image level, allowing you to pull specific versions of images for deployment. Helm, on the other hand, offers versioning at the chart level, making it easier to manage and rollback changes to application configurations and dependencies.
6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Docker has a larger community and ecosystem focused on containerization technologies, providing a wide range of tools, integrations, and support for container-based workflows. Helm, being more focused on Kubernetes application management, has a smaller but dedicated community that offers a variety of charts, plugins, and resources specifically tailored for Kubernetes deployments.
## Summary
In Summary, Docker and Helm differ in their approach to containerization, package management, configuration, dependency handling, versioning, and community ecosystems within the Kubernetes landscape.
Decisions about Docker and Helm
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 455.7K views
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MorePros of Docker
Pros of Helm
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Helm
- Infrastructure as code8
- Open source6
- Easy setup2
- Support1
- Testability and reproducibility1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
Cons of Helm
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3
Cons of Helm
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Docker?
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
What is Helm?
Helm is the best way to find, share, and use software built for Kubernetes.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention Docker and Helm as a desired skillset
What companies use Docker?
What companies use Helm?
What companies use Helm?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Docker?
What tools integrate with Helm?
What tools integrate with Docker?
What tools integrate with Helm?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
What are some alternatives to Docker and Helm?
LXC
LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.
rkt
Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.
Kubernetes
Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
Vagrant
Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.