Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs Flocker: What are the differences?
Introduction
Docker and Flocker are both technologies used in the field of containerization. While Docker focuses on creating and managing isolated containers, Flocker aims to enable the portability and data persistence of containers.
Portability: Docker provides a highly portable environment by packaging applications and their dependencies into containers. These containers can be run on any system that supports Docker, making it easy to deploy applications across different environments. On the other hand, Flocker goes beyond container portability by allowing the movement of containers along with their associated data across different hosts or clusters.
Data Management: Docker containers are designed to be stateless, meaning they do not store data persistently. Flocker, however, addresses this limitation by providing container-level data management. It allows data volumes to be moved and associated with containers, ensuring data persistence and availability even when containers are moved to different hosts.
Scalability: Docker's focus is on container orchestration and management, making it highly scalable. It provides features like automatic scaling, load balancing, and service discovery. Flocker, on the other hand, primarily focuses on data management and portability, and does not offer built-in scalability features. However, Flocker can be used in conjunction with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes to achieve scalability.
Multi-Host Support: Docker primarily operates on a single host, with containers running independently on that host. Flocker, in contrast, supports multi-host deployments and allows the movement of containers and their associated data across different hosts or clusters. This enables distributed applications and data to be managed effectively.
Data Consistency: Docker containers are typically isolated from each other and do not share a common data source. Flocker provides a mechanism for managing data consistency across containers by enabling the movement of data volumes along with the containers. This ensures that containers always have access to the latest and consistent data.
Use Cases: Docker is widely used for application development, deployment, and scaling. It is commonly used by developers to package their applications and dependencies into containers for easy distribution and deployment. Flocker, on the other hand, is primarily used in scenarios where data persistence and portability are critical, such as database clusters and stateful applications.
In summary, Docker focuses on providing a highly portable and scalable environment for containerized applications, while Flocker emphasizes on data persistence and portability across hosts or clusters.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Flocker
- Open-Source4
- Easily manage Docker containers with Data3
- Easy setup2
- Great support from their team2
- Multi-host docker-compose support2
- Only requires docker2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3