StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Swarm Visualizer vs Portainer

Docker Swarm Visualizer vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Swarm Visualizer
Docker Swarm Visualizer
Stacks25
Followers108
Votes3
Portainer
Portainer
Stacks507
Followers842
Votes146

Docker Swarm Visualizer vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Docker Swarm Visualizer and Portainer

  1. User Interface: Docker Swarm Visualizer provides a visual representation of Docker Swarm clusters, allowing users to easily visualize the status and distribution of services across nodes. On the other hand, Portainer offers a comprehensive web-based interface that not only allows users to manage Docker Swarm clusters but also provides support for managing individual Docker hosts, containers, volumes, and networks. Portainer's interface provides more extensive management capabilities compared to Docker Swarm Visualizer's visualization-only approach.

  2. Ease of Use: Docker Swarm Visualizer focuses primarily on providing a visually appealing interface to monitor Docker Swarm clusters. It requires minimal configuration and setup, making it easy to deploy and use. In contrast, Portainer offers a more feature-rich and powerful platform for managing Docker environments, which requires more setup and configuration. However, this additional complexity enables Portainer to offer a broader range of functionalities.

  3. Cluster Management: Docker Swarm Visualizer offers basic information about the nodes and services in the Docker Swarm cluster, allowing users to monitor the state of the cluster. However, it does not provide advanced management functionalities such as scaling services, creating stacks, or managing secrets. Portainer, on the other hand, provides extensive cluster management capabilities, allowing users to perform tasks such as scaling services, managing service networks, deploying stacks, and creating secrets, giving users more control and flexibility in managing their Docker environment.

  4. Authentication and Access Control: Docker Swarm Visualizer does not offer built-in authentication or access control mechanisms. It solely focuses on providing the visualization aspect of Docker Swarm. In contrast, Portainer offers robust authentication and access control mechanisms, allowing administrators to define user roles and permissions, ensuring secure access to container management functionalities. This makes Portainer a better choice for environments where security is a top priority.

  5. Extensibility: Docker Swarm Visualizer is a standalone tool that provides visual representation of Docker Swarm clusters, and it does not offer extensibility options or plugin support. On the other hand, Portainer provides a plugin framework that allows users to extend its functionality through third-party plugins. This extensibility enables users to customize and enhance Portainer's features based on their specific requirements.

  6. Community Ecosystem: Docker Swarm Visualizer is a lightweight tool, which has a smaller community ecosystem compared to Portainer. Portainer, being a more comprehensive and widely used Docker management tool, has a larger user community that actively contributes to its development and provides support. This larger community ecosystem contributes to the availability of resources, plugins, and overall community support for Portainer users.

In Summary, Docker Swarm Visualizer provides a visually appealing way to monitor Docker Swarm clusters, while Portainer offers a comprehensive web-based interface with advanced management capabilities for Docker environments, including cluster management, authentication, and extensibility options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Swarm Visualizer
Docker Swarm Visualizer
Portainer
Portainer

Each node in the swarm will show all tasks running on it. When a service goes down it'll be removed. When a node goes down it won't, instead the circle at the top will turn red to indicate it went down. Tasks will be removed.

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

-
Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
Stacks
25
Stacks
507
Followers
108
Followers
842
Votes
3
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Reverse proxy support
  • 1
    Stateless
  • 1
    Easy to deploy
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Docker Swarm Visualizer, Portainer?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana